Theos-Talk Archives (December 2003 Message tt00072)

Hallo Bart and all of you,

My views are:

Thanks for your remarks.

You wrote in the below:
"And some methodology must be put
> in place to prevent the incredible amount of corruption that takes place
> due to tiny, petty dictatorships having the same vote as huge (or even
> medium sized) democracies and democratic republics."

My view:
But, is it not so, that corruption is not only going on in these dictator
countries, but also in and around UN ?
Economical Lobbyism is also a problem
If you are a big democratic country - you might not have a dictatorship
(although at leadt one of todays majority governments sometimes looks the
same), but instead you have
the - trade-cartels, Bilderbeger Groups and similar hanging in your ears. Do
you not agree ?
They are the ones who elect presidents !

In fact Lyndon Johnson once said, that the massmedias are so powefull, that
they can
decide who is sitting as a president in USA !
Now there is a few persons who own most of the Massmedias in the USA.
(USA the leading or misleading - MEDIA country in the world)
- Just one example: In Denmark - the evening news on foreign relations are
often copied from CNN.

But they happily don't - really - own the Internet !
But, they will also try to own that, no doubt.
Then one will have to pay money to watch - certain websites in some
countries - and/or have a password.
(Anti-terror would be the reason to this arrangement.)
The Internet has already an existing cultural tendency - with historical
relations to the 5th rootrace of the Aryan conquerers.
The Internet was in many ways created by USA citizens.
Do you not agree ?

Democracy can not be said to be a reality as long as cowboy-like
trade-policies al a Goring rules the boats in different countries.
Please think about this sentences.

You know Goring - Hitlers friend was against Hitlers invasion of Sovjet -
and wanted a trades empire instead.
And if Hitler had agreed - the EU would have been created - about 50 years
earlier.
But they had to develop the Nuclear bomb before reason - sort of - came
along.
Hitler was hungry for blood and lost it all.
USA's trades politics could be compared to Gorings ideas. EU as well with
its new European Union.
There are of course big differences, but there are also certain ugly
similarities.

I often meditate on the movie named "Yes - Minister" - with the excellent
civil servant named "Humphrey".
Do they have a "Humphrey" in USA ?

Politics and democracy without religion - pointing its fingers at certain
religious countries --- is like a gnat pointing at the elephant
without realising that it can be looked upon in many different manners.

Now let us see, what the evaluation of the UN meeting on the Internet will
throw off.

from
M. Sufilight with peace and love...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bart Lidofsky" <bartl@sprynet.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: It's not who in 1975, but what


> Morten Nymann Olesen wrote:
> > A United Nations, which since 1945/1948 has dared - in the name of
peace -
> > to deny - ANY Middle Eastern country to have a PERMANENT seat in the
United
> > Nations Security Counsil (--- The mini world Government ! ---). A United
> > Nations which has as its highest founded duty - to seek the creation of
> > peace on this Planet. --- How fake can one be ?
>
> OK, it MIGHT help to know a LITTLE bit about the theory on which the
> United Nations was created, which might also explain why it needs
> modification.
>
> The United Nations was designed to be a world diplomatic body, NOT a
> world governing body. U.N. resolutions are recommendations only; they
> only have the force of international law when backed by treaty (where
> the nations involved have promised to abide by said resolutions). It WAS
> decided that, sometimes, the U.N. would need to use military force.
> However, there was a problem with allowing the whole U.N. to do this.
> With one nation, one vote, a small minority of the world's population,
> who would not need to provide a single soldier, could order around the
> military of the other nations. It's a lot easier to send other people to
> potential deaths than it is to send your own. Therefore, the Security
> Council was made up of those nations who would have to provide the bulk
> of the military forces.
>
> The problem is that the entire process was based on the political
> situation of the world right after World War II. Things have changed
> greatly since then. The U.N. needs to be restructured in a more flexible
> format, that can change with the times. And some methodology must be put
> in place to prevent the incredible amount of corruption that takes place
> due to tiny, petty dictatorships having the same vote as huge (or even
> medium sized) democracies and democratic republics. Otherwise, you will
> see resolutions like, "The citizens of the United States and China have
> to give up half their incomes to be distributed among these following
> countries" (kind of like the Kyoto Agreement).
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>