Theos-Talk Archives (August 2003 Message tt00045)

Steve, thanks for the add info.
Yes, this movie is well known in conspiracy circles. The film maker first
intended to make a film about the faked moon landing which actually was
produced by Hollywood's trick specialists. Someone wanted to kill him and he
decided to rewrite the script and took Mars for moon. But the story is the
same. Yes, it is dangerous to speak out the truth. But actually that is the
character HPB wants form every pukka Theosophist. I recently saw a
documentation about the pros and cons of the Apollo flight and it was stated
that ten NASA scientists lost their life after 1969 who did not believe the
landing to be true and began to speak publicy. Just remember David Kelly who
was suicided by the Illuminates after he publicly spoke about the Iraq lies.
Hans Blix said now the same. Hope, he survives. This recent examples show
the difference from the Aryan point of view. The now ruling background
power, whose only weapon is desinformation, cant, hypocrisy, lie and
projection (the effects HPB in her interview with Ch. Johnson called
hypnotism, at that it really is) is not even true in its crimes. Even cant
over their crimes. The Bolshevist system said that every one who opposes
them will be shot or get psychatrized.
In England and USA the truth seekers and victims of the legal tyranny (HPB)
are commiting "suicide". That is nothing else than the Talmud mind.
Frank

----- Original Message -----
From: "stevestubbs" <stevestubbs@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 3:30 AM
Subject: Theos-World Re: Faked Apollo Moon landing?


I forget which movie company made it, but there was a film called
CAPRICORN ONE or something like that which showed how the moon
landing was filmed in a movie studio in California. I saw the so
called Lunar Lander at the Smithsonian Museum and it obviously has
not been anywhere, let alone to the moon. You have to be careful
with whom you discuss this, though. Some fellow approached one of
the "astronauts" a year or so ago and asked him politely about the
moon landing and got assaulted for his trouble. Apparently
this "astronaut" has been living off this laurel for years and is
very sensitive about people prying too deeply into his claims.

It makes one wonder about some of the other claims that have been
made. How much is real and how much fake?


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dhyana@w...>
wrote:
> There are inquiries what Theosophy says about the recent discussion
whether the Apollo moon landing really happened or was rather staged
by Walt Disney Inc. in Hollywood and/or Area 51.
> Although many California theosophists (mainly from the former Point
Loma area) has had close relationships with astrophysicists and to
Mount Palomar I was not able to dig out much theosophical
information, except two and would like to share them here for the
benefit of others which are interested in this topic or have to
answer equal inquiries:
>
> 1. Boris de Zirkoff inserted in his edition of the "Secrete
Doctrine" many NASA photos to illustrate the wide ranging and
anticipating importance of HPB's major work. But he included not a
single photo from the Moon landing, although the moon as the parent
of the Earth plays an important role in HPB's Cosmogenesis and in the
1970's when BdeZ edition appeared the Moon landing was the sign for
successful, intelligent scientific progress. So why no moon landing
photos inserted?
>
> 2. De Purucker told a private class around 1927 the following,
which could be regarded in the aftermath as a warning:
> "What we see when we look up into the starry spaces is the astral
body, the kama-rupa of the physical moon that was, aeons and aeons
ago, which physical body is now disintegrated into impalpable cosmic
dust. We perceive this kama-rupic phantom, because our physical earth
is one subplane higher than that on which the physical body of the
moon was. Were our scientists by some magic to be transported to the
moon, even though they would be able to see it almost as clearly as
they see our earth, I do not believe they would find it easy to walk
about on its surface, for it is not quite hard enough for easy
walking."
>
> Source: http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/fso/fso7b.htm#moon
>
> [German translation: "Quelle des Okkultismus", München,
Theosophical University Press 1986, Band 3, S. 144.]
>
> Perhaps others have addition theosophical material pro or con the
Moon landing topic.
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/