Theos-Talk Archives (June 2003 Message tt00275)

hehehe. As you go off into the netherland of "some really important
theosophical work" let me get your coat and show you to the door. There is
a total disconnect between the way you treat people on these various lists
and the way you say you expect people to be treated. This disconnect is so
great that it leads me to conclude that you do not see yourself as you
really are at all. Perhaps you should try Wry's "observer" activities for a
time. You say: "People picking on people is no way to discuss theosophy --
or any other matter for that matter", and yet picking on people is what you
do best and most often.

I am not going to take your crap anymore. If you want a piece of me, we can
meet tonight on the sunny side of Venus (astral plane of course) and I will
kick your astral ass. hehehe

Meredith
----- Original Message -----
From: <leonmaurer@aol.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:06 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Recruitment and education...


> Well, at least your sense of humor is still intact. It finally puts the
cap
> on all these senseless conversations between all those people mentioned.
As
> for me, you don't have to worry. I'm getting too busy with some really
> important theosophical work to take the time to read all the nonsense
that's been
> floating around here lately (except maybe for a few gems from guys like
Dallas).
> People picking on people is no way to discuss theosophy -- or any other
> matter for that matter. From here on out, it's your show. Or wry's, if
she gets
> her 200 disciples online here -- which I seriously doubt judging by the
quality
> of the primative ideas bandied around as if that's all there is to
theosophy.
> (Making jokes is another matter altogether, and if there was more of that
> maybe I'd stick around for awhile.:-)
>
> LHM (The man from inner space)
>
> In a message dated 06/26/03 9:46:34 PM, bill_meredith@earthlink.net
writes:
>
> >As a True Theosophist I speak the Truth. Listen to me Leonardo Hermes
> >Maurer. You are interfering with the developmental learning curve of
Morten
> >as he sheds his cocoon with the help of Bart and to a lessor extent Wry.
> >Stop Immediately. Consider yourself warned!
> >Meredith (man from the sea)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: <leonmaurer@aol.com>
>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:09 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Recruitment and education...
>
>
>
> >
>
> > In a message dated 06/25/03 3:16:53 PM, bartl@sprynet.com writes:
>
> >
>
> > >In your case, the terminology you are using, regardless of your real
>
> > >opinions, makes you appear haughty and egotistical. Yes, H. P.
Blavatsky
>
> > >used similar language sometimes, but the occasions were few and far
>
> > >between, and, to a certain extent, she had the right to say them,
>
> > >because she was starting the movement. And, to a certain extent, she
>
> > >turned off a lot of potential students by using them, as well.
>
> >
>
> > Getting tired of this futile personality nonsense. This is simply your
>
> own
>
> > perceptions. And what hang ups you have that precipitate them are
strictly
>
> in
>
> > your own mind. As for the rest of us, we can make our own decisions as
to
>
> what
>
> > is "haughty and egotistical" and what is not. (And, in any cases, what
>
> > difference would that make as to the validity of what we hear or read?)
>
> Frankly I
>
> > think your perceptions are, to say the least, full of crap. Most of us
>
> "true
>
> > (vid: "honest") theosophists" read what people say and interpret the
>
> meanings
>
> > for ourselves based on our own ideas and perceptions and what
theosophical
>
> > knowledge we have learned... And generally, I would assume, don't (or at
>
> least
>
> > try not to) apply personal prejudices in making our judgments as to the
>
> validity
>
> > of the statements made or quotations given. Besides, what gives you the
>
> > chutzpah to say what right anyone else has to say what they need to say
in
>
> any way
>
> > they want to or can say it? If you are one of the students HPB "turned
>
> off"
>
> > for using the forms of language she chose, why are you here discussing
her
>
> > work? And what has starting a movement got do with any rights HPB had
to
>
> speak
>
> > her truth in any way she needed to or was capable of? Now I know why
ULT
>
> and
>
> > the Theosophy Company requests that any public speakers or writers on
>
> > theosophical ideas remain anonymous. It's to keep judgmental people
like
>
> you from
>
> > making presumptions about, or "turning off" what they say based on
>
> personality
>
> > factors. On the other hand, if you are a long time theosophist, haven't
>
> you
>
> > understood yet that HPB said much more between her lines than she said
>
> within
>
> > them? The last three keys are as obvious in HPB's writing to the
>
> "intuitive
>
> > student," as well as to an "Adept," as if she had written them in stone.
>
> She
>
> > telegraphed this in so many places in her writings that it would be
>
> pointless to
>
> > point them out... Especially to those who are only capable of skimming
the
>
> > surface of esoteric or occult realities. So, maybe it's about time we
all
>
> woke up
>
> > and smelled the coffee before spouting our inconsequential and ad
hominem
>
> > comments about other people's ideas and perceptions -- about ALL aspects
>
> of "true
>
> > theosophy" (which we can either know intuitively, or not -- depending on
>
> our
>
> > "readiness" to learn as well as our level of "self realization"). So,
>
> where
>
> > are you pontificating from with your inconsequential and time and energy
>
> > wasting personality projections?
>
> >
>
> > LHM
>
> >
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>