Theos-Talk Archives (June 2003 Message tt00274)

Hi Dallas (a "hi" there for you for a change, eh, Dallas! :-),

Seems to me that if there were more evidence brought to the 
attention of the general public about such as "forbidden arche-
ology," that might help in the formation of a more-realistic 
general perspective on human evolution and background ... and might
even help in putting some kind of Theosophics on some kind of 
more generally recognized map, maybe, at some point ...

Speculatively,
Mauri

dalval14 wrote:
> 
> Thursday, June 26, 2003
> 
> Re Sandstone references re footprints of Giants
> 
> To add to this information
> 
> >From June 17th more details on:
> 
> "Also contemporary, is a massive volume: FORBIDDEN ARCHAEOLOGY
> by Thomas (?) in which evidence is advanced challenging the
> theory and dating of man's arrival in the Americas from Asia over
> the Behring straight "land-bridge". It has been followed by a
> surprising account of the reception given to this book by the
> Scientific community. Apparently a number of "digs" have
> revealed the presence of man (determined by relicts in deposits)
> far earlier than approximately 25 to 35,000 BC . This of course
> upsets the scientific dating. I have noticed that main-stream
> Science tends to ignore these
> questions.