Theos-Talk Archives (May 2003 Message tt00194)

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:13:52 -0000
From: "Daniel H. Caldwell" <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
Subject: Steven Levey on "HPB's direct lineage"

Steven Levey, a ULT student, wrote:

". . . Those in HPB's DIRECT LINEAGE, which leaves out many, if not 
most writers in the Thesophical Society, who have recieved FURTHER 
instruction from the Lodge of Mahatmas, have never given a collection 
of the Mahatma letters to be printed. . . . " CAPS ADDED.
Quoted from:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/9217

One correspondent has emailed me asking what Steven Levey is actually 
referring to when he writes about HPB's DIRECT LINEAGE. What exactly 
does he mean by DIRECT LINEAGE? What persons constitute this LINEAGE?

And what does he mean by FURTHER instruction from the Masters?

I must admit that I am not clear myself what he is writing about. 
Since he is in the ULT, I might speculate that he is referring to the 
ULT'S DIRECT LINEAGE.

Can anyone (maybe even Steven Levey) clear up these questions?

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY STUDY CENTER/BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://blavatskyarchives.com
=============================================
We ,as humans, could say we have three stages. Before we were born (not 
visible), 
are now (visible), after we die.(also, not visible).
Which stage could or do we most often talk the most about?
Lineages , from an occult view, might be said to be not visible.
Ergo , we might need an "invisible" language to talk rationally about direct 
lineages and might be a "trap" in the "visible".
The written TS philosophy is visible.
This reply is visible. :O)