Theos-Talk Archives (January 2003 Message tt00412)

Daniel - I have seen all those links before that you feel are 
good 'arguments' for AAB being derived from CWL etc. The only link 
has any relevance is " Alice Bailey Teachings Examined", and I am 
quite familiar with it. When you cut to the chase, it is a very 
short couple of pages where the author mainly compares CWL and AAB 
on the rays. It is superficial and based on not much knowledge of 
the rays as the author freely admits. 
Therefore it is a very lightweight argument which stands on the 
flimsiest of ground. The other article's are NW and the incredibly 
biased Hump and Leather.
You guys have got to come up with something better than that. It is 
ignorance hiding behind the veil of 'scholasticism'.

P.

> http://blavatskyarchives.com/contradictionslatermessengers.htm#3