Theos-Talk Archives (December 2002 Message tt00387)

In a message dated 12/11/02 8:41:03 PM, stevestubbs@yahoo.com writes:

>--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Bart Lidofsky <bartl@s...> wrote:
>> Perhaps some of us don't like people who try to present lies as the
>> truth discussing in a list devoted to a group of organizations who have
>> the motto "There is no religion higher than Truth." 
>
>I suspect what you do not like is that not everyone is a monarchist. 
>I do not share your view, but I do support your right to assert it. 
>In fact, I LIKE you doing so. Vigorous and spirited discussion is 
>the mark of a healthy society.
>
>As for the motto, that was the Maharajah of Benares' motto, the 
>person whom I suspect, perhaps incorrectly, of being the real person 
>behind the moniker "Morya." It should be said, to keep this in 
>perspective, that Blavatsky frankly stated that many of her 
>statements were untruths (blinds, deliberately misleading, etc.) Why 
>she or her masters would have chosen to do that is a mystery to me, 
>but on the terms of the motto Thesosophy is not the highest religion.
>

It's also a fact that according to theosophy -- "truth" is for the students 
or chelas to dig out for themselves -- not for the teacher or guru to tell 
them. All the gurus can do -- to stay within their vows of silence about 
certain things -- is point the way by laying down hints and hidden guidelines 
that only the truly intuitively developed ones, and particularly, avowed 
chelas, can understand and follow, as well as take responsibility for. Some 
of these partial or half truths, acting as "blinds" and misdirection's could 
be considered as untruths... But, how else could chelas be trained 
esoterically out of the same exoteric books read by the uninitiated?

As you cannot imagine the necessity for that, I guess you are not one of them 
(yet) -- since, if you were, it wouldn't be such a "mystery," and you would 
know how dangerous some truths really are for those of limited vision... And, 
especially, for those uninitiated historians, psychic dabblers, curiosity se
ekers, and politicians who can't see the forest for the trees... And, if they 
did, might proceed to harvest it all for themselves. 

Can you imagine the possibility of a multi configured "Krystaloid" 
(uniomniform) shape with a unique composition that could generate 
controllable free energy from the zero-point vacuum of space, but also, if 
mishandled, could start a chain reaction that might seed and generate a 
massive black hole where the solar system used to be? I am certain of it, 
knowing what I know of Superstring/M-brane theory and the theory of ABC... 
And, you can bet your bottom dollar that that possibility is as real today as 
Atomic energy and the A-bomb was in 1898 - 1905 when Madame Curie's Theory of 
Radioactivity, and Einstein's Theory of Relativity along with the equivalence 
of energy and matter equation (E=mc^2) was just being born.

But then, sometimes, such dangerous knowledge has to be let out in small 
jumps, and to the right people... Since, how can we advance to the next giant 
step of cyclic progress without nature (or ourselves) culling out those who 
can't make that leap, and whom, by being frozen in their vicious circles of 
greed and restrictive societies and "civilizations," inhibit those that can? 
Those people might deserve the "instant karma" brought about by their misuse 
of such powers. But, then again, isn't it up to the true theosophists to 
prevent just that from happening? So that even those misguided ones -- could 
they become the seeds that grow around our nuclei -- might enjoy the paradise 
on Earth that the flowering of Universal Brotherhood could bring about in a 
relative Jiffy? 

Is that why HPB said we are already 1 million years behind in evolution -- 
presumedly, because of the mistakes made by the Atlantians who misused their 
"Crystal" energy? Was that why HPB gave out the hints that enabled an 
enlightened and compassionate person like Einstein to intuit and formulate 
E=mc^2? Isn't controlled radioactivity also a force for good as well as bad? 
And, isn't the relationship of atomic energy to zero-point energy as 
relative as one manvantara is to another, or one level of truth to another? 

In any event. I doubt if there is any ultimate "TRUTH" to be known, by even 
those who hide or "blind" the truths they do know from those, like most of 
us, who don't yet know. Even the zero-point itself is relative, and changes 
its force and inertia from one level of reality to another -- in and infinite 
series of transmutations -- from within Brahma to Para^10+brahm and beyond. 
It seems, then, that the higher the religion, the greater the Truths 
necessary to hide, mislead, or lie about. :-)

LHM
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/einstein.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/yinyang.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/evolution2.html