Theos-World Re: God as "A Being" versus God as "No-being"
Nov 25, 2002 06:28 AM
by Steve Stubbs
--- In theos-talk@y..., samblo@c... wrote:
> As to becoming dependent of the Church Fathers, I do shy from that
> I recall
> reading one that said "We create these lies for the good of
That's probably true, but they were initiated into th esoteric
teaching and let it out in bits and bobs throughout their writings.
I had to read through a mountain of preposterous drivel to get the
axattered nuggets of esoteric teaching, but it was well worth it.
The exoteric system sucks, but the esoteric system really is
sublime. Also, I liked Mead's books, but if he assembled the
esoteric system he never wrote about it, nor has anyone else to my
knowledge. It still remains secret after 2000 years. What is
interesting about Paul is what is hidden in there, not what is stated
openly. He wrote about nantra neditation, astral projecion, Merkabah
mysticism, and all sorts of other things, and saying nothing too
plainly. One thing you will not see in the English translations is
that all the terminology if the gnostics is in his letters. He
writes about archons, Aeons, pleroma, etc. The English translations
were done so as to conceal that fact, so you have to go back to the
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application