|
|
| [MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
| [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Oct 01, 2002 11:24 PM
by Mic Forster
--- leonmaurer@aol.com wrote: > > > > Although, we could say that a cycle or wave of a > stock market fluctuation, > does have an "impact" on people's pocketbooks -- and > therefore, while flowing > like a wave, it "acts like" a particle... (So, a 90 > percent drop in the price > of a stock could certainly knock over a big > corporation or its stockholders. > :-) But then, that sort of cyclic change is not > analogous to, or corresponds > with a cyclic quantum wave -- such as the fixed > frequencies of the light > energy spectrum. To compare one with the other is > like comparing apples to > oranges, and is a categorical error. > > LHM > So when is a wave not a wave? I accept that it is not entirely correct to call fluctuations in a stock market a wave, well a quantum wave, but does it not have all the other properties of a wave? That is, a disturbance propegated through a medium; something that carries energy etc etc.... mic __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com