Theos-Talk Archives (September 2002 Message tt00015)

What have labels or personalities got to do with scientific reasoning or 
logical discussion? 

Did anyone ever say that theosophy was discussed or Blavatsky referred to on 
scientific consciousness study forums? 

My view of consciousness and evolution argued or discussed on those forums is 
based solely on the theory of ABC and other scientific theories such 
Superstring/M-brane, relativity, quantum field, quantum 
electro-chromodynamics, etc. -- much of which (although limited in scope) are 
consistent with theosophical metaphysics. 

I only mention those comparisons or consistencies on Theosophical forums. On 
the scientific consciousness study forums, I am careful to let my arguments 
(about universal involution and evolution, based on zero-point origins, 
coadunate, coenergetic fields of varying substantiality, and fundamental 
laws) speak for themselves... And, try NOT to make non-sequitur references, 
refer to irrelevant authorities, select quotes out of context, use fallacious 
logic, or not specifically qualify "guesses" and "opinions." If you read the 
JCS-online letters I cross posted to this forum, you might comprehend this, 
and not continue nit picking and making sly innuendoes about your opponent's 
credibility. But then, since your arguments and assertions are based on those 
forbidden propaganda techniques, I don't suppose you understand what 
scientific reasoning or logical discussion is all about.

Again, I say, if you wish to discuss these topics intelligently, I suggest 
you study modern and post modern physics as well as the theosophical 
metaphysics presented by HPB in the Secret Doctrine, and make the comparisons 
yourself. Without that knowledge and understanding, other that the possible 
benefit to theosophists wishing to have a better scientific understanding of 
theosophical metaphysics, reading your off the wall comments and unfounded 
opinions about theosophy and HPB, and arguing with you about them -- is a 
complete waste of all our time. 

LHM


In a message dated 09/01/02 10:09:33 PM, brianmuehlbach@yahoo.com writes:

>Re."the Journal of Consciousness Study online forum, that argues a 
> view of consciousness and evolution that's perfectly consistent with
>the teachings of Cosmogenesis in the Secret Doctrine."
>
>
>The "search Archive" at "JCS-online" shows
>
>0=zero messages containing the word Theosophy. 
>
>0=zero messages containing a refernce to even Blavatsky.