Theos-Talk Archives (September 2002 Message tt00014)

the search of ALL scientific and related databases,
containing research articles and the like from
academics from around the world, yielded ZERO results
for Brigitte Muehlegger (Muhlegger). A similar search
of the University of Vienna, and an exhaustive search
of the Institute of Mathematics, also yielded ZERO
results for Brigitte Muehlegger.

What is it, exactly, that the University of Vienna,
and the people of Austria, is/are paying you to do?

If you have so much scientific credibility why is it
that you have contributed absolutely nothing to the
scientific community?


--- brianmuehlbach <brianmuehlbach@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Re."the Journal of Consciousness Study online forum,
> that argues a 
> view of consciousness and evolution that's
> perfectly consistent with
> the teachings of Cosmogenesis in the Secret
> Doctrine."
> 
> 
> The "search Archive" at "JCS-online" shows
> 
> 0=zero messages containing the word Theosophy. 
> 
> 0=zero messages containing a refernce to even 
> Blavatsky.
> 
> 
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> --- In theos-talk@y..., leonmaurer@a... wrote:
> > Before going off with half cocked opinions, as
> usual -- maybe you 
> should 
> > Check with the "Journal of Consciousness Study"
> at: 
> > http://www.zynet.co.uk/imprint/, or go to
> http://groups.yahoo.com/ 
> and search 
> > for the "JCS-online" e-mail forum. You might find
> in their
> archives 
> some 
> > interesting dialogs over the past ten years with
> accredited
> scientists of 
> > many disciplines. Hope you enjoy reading them and
> finding out how 
> much 
> > science doesn't know about the nature of at least
> half the reality
> in the 
> > universe -- namely, consciousness and evolution. 
> > 
> > Even though this heavily subscribed forum is
> moderated and accepts 
> only four 
> > letters per day, it welcomes contributions by
> every intellectual 
> discipline. 
> > Apropos, you shouldn't be amazed by the lack of
> "historians" and 
> > "theologians" -- who would never dare to argue
> with "scientists"
> about 
> such 
> > "fact" or "logic" dependent subjects. However, my
> letters are
> always 
> > published, and, so far, in over ten years, no one
> has been able to 
> punch a 
> > hole in my theosophical metaphysically and
> scientifically
> consistent 
> > theories. These letters, incidentally, are planned
> to be published
> in my 
> book 
> > "On the Threshold of a New Science and Technology"
> (if I ever get 
> around to 
> > finishing it :-). 
> > 
> > In fact, lately, with the gradual acceptance of
> Superstring/M-
> brane "theories 
> > of everything" -- that more or less confirm
> theosophical
> metaphysics 
> as well 
> > as ABC -- there have been much softer counter
> arguments on 
> the "JCS" forum, 
> > as well as on the "Science & Consciousness
> Review," "Quantum 
> Mind," "Psyche," 
> > and "Mind-Brain" forums that I participate in. In
> fact, many
> scientist's, 
> > when their theories are challenged, refuse to
> respond -- probably 
> because 
> > they haven''t anything to say. :-) Or, like some
> others who have
> come 
> around 
> > to agree with my view, they are afraid to respond
> publicly -- since 
> their 
> > "peer reviewable" academic credibility and/or jobs
> depend on them 
> following 
> > the "party lines" of conventional academic
> science. 
> > 
> > So, thanks for giving me the opportunity of
> publicly confirming my 
> veracity, 
> > along with HPB's, as well as the "truths" of
> theosophical
> metaphysical 
> > science -- which are entirely consistent with
> cutting edge, 
> multidimensional 
> > physical scientific truth that contradicts or adds
> further
> theosophically 
> > consistent "facts" to conventional modern
> scientific "theories" --
> as 
> HPB 
> > predicted would happen around this time in
> history.
> > 
> > LHM
> >
>
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/ABC_bw.html
> > http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisan
> s.guild/einstein.html
> > 
> http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.
> guild/chakrafield.html
> > 
> > In a message dated 09/01/02 8:10:06 AM,
> brianmuehlbach@y... 
> writes:
> > 
> > > "Journal of Consciousness Study online forum" ?
> > >
> > >Brian: There is no such forum in existence.
> > > 
> 
> 
> > > Brian
> > >
> > >--- In theos-talk@y..., leonmaurer@a... wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> In a message dated 08/31/02 10:32:03 AM,
> Nisk98114@a... 
> writes:
> > >> 
> > >> >In a message dated 8/30/02 5:18:38 PM Eastern
> Daylight Time, 
> > >> >leonmaurer@a... writes:
> > >> >
> > >> > Since consciousness and its evolution is the
> bugaboo of
> science 
> > >> > but well understood by theosophy, I thought
> you all might be 
> interested 
> > in 
> > >> > this recent dialogue on the Journal of
> Consciousness Study 
> online forum, 
> > >> > that argues a view of consciousness and
> evolution that's 
> perfectly 
> > >> > consistent with the teachings of Cosmogenesis
> in the Secret 
> Doctrine.
> > >> > 
> > >> > Lenny >>
> > >> 
> > (snip)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com