Theos-Talk Archives (July 2002 Message tt00046)

--- Frank Reitemeyer <dhyana@web.de> wrote:
> Can't find any entry whether in my paper
> dictionaries nor in my electronical
> (Babylon) what a nut case is

Sorry, that is a colloquialism. Another way of saying
it would be that he is paddling with a dry oar. 
Larouche could be kindly described as a man with
opinions of doubtful validity, and unkindly as the
high apostle of the lunatic fringe. Any statements of
fact that come from him would have to be accepted only
when verified by better sources of information if at
all.

> From the last words of Bush against Arafat one can
> only conclude that the
> war partyliners now have complete control and that
> the stroke against Iraq
> and several other Arab countries will take place
> soon.

I am more optimistic. I think the line regarding
Arafat is best viewed as a negotiating gambit and that
the war with Iraq will not happen. Prophecy is a
risky business. Time will tell if I am right.

> O my God (I don't want to belittle you personally).
> Samuel Huntington is
> with Henry Kissinger, Brzinski and Wolfowitz the
> leading ideologist. Read
> H.' books "Clash of Civilizations" and you know WHY
> Bush MUST have been
> elected, no matter what the voters in Florida and
> elsewhere said.

Thanks for the clarification. Now I know who you
mean. There is a useful article on him at:

http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2001/12/kaplan.htm



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com