Theos-Talk Archives (July 2002 Message tt00035)

>It may not be apparent from Germany, but Lyndon
>Larouche is a well known nut case.

Can't find any entry whether in my paper dictionaries nor in my electronical
(Babylon) what a nut case is but I think you mean LaRouche is incompetent.
Of course I no it because I read also his critics and he himself publishes
the comments of his critics, this week f.e. the (idiotic) critics of Gore
Vidal.
I myself support some points from LaRouche and others not. F.e. I believe
what LaRouche says about the 9/11 and the faked Bin Laden story and that
Laden and no other Arab would have been technically and logistically been
able to make this military exact operation and that this shows an internal
fight wihtin the US government.
>From the last words of Bush against Arafat one can only conclude that the
war partyliners now have complete control and that the stroke against Iraq
and several other Arab countries will take place soon.

But I don't share f.e. his praise of FDR.

>I missed something somewhere. Who is Huntington?

O my God (I don't want to belittle you personally). Samuel Huntington is
with Henry Kissinger, Brzinski and Wolfowitz the leading ideologist. Read
H.' books "Clash of Civilizations" and you know WHY Bush MUST have been
elected, no matter what the voters in Florida and elsewhere said. They
believe that the biblical end of the times - Armageddon - is NOW THERE and
that Israel should rule the world and that Jerusalem should be world
capital.
According to his book there exists no common basic between the world
religions and no universal brotherhoodand that the strongest race must
strike first before the other ones strike the Jewish-Christian
civilizations.
Here you have the open and public program for WW III.


>My memory of the events may be inaccurate, but I
>thought when Himmlet pushed Goering out of the way and
>took over the Gestapo Mueller was dismissed. I read a

No. On the contrary Mueller was advanced in rank and salery for his good
work.
Frank