Theos-Talk Archives (January 2002 Message tt00155)

--- In theos-talk@y..., Blavatsky Archives <blavatskyarchives@y...> 
wrote:
> Cranston's book on HPB can be faulted in many ways
> similar to Johnson's books. She omits important
> relevant information just as Johnson does. There are
> also many statements in her book which are inaccurate
> just as in Johnson's books. etc.
> 
> All in all, I don't see Johnson's books any more or
> less "scholarly" than Cranston's. All have good and
> bad points

Well, I can't resist asking a sincere question. Why the hell have 
you spent 8 years viciously attacking my books, devoting thousands 
upon thousands of words to it-- right down to TODAY, and never said 
one word publicly critical of Cranston's?

Could it have anything to do with which side your bread is buttered 
on?