Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00466)

Brigitte, you wrote:

"I also note that in spite of posting a significant long essay today, 
Daniel still did not answer the questions he thanked for six days ago 
but did not answer, and to wich today I already added a part V."

Brigitte, what I wrote to you 6 days ago 
[see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/4265 ]
STILL APPLIES. Please re-read it.

I am trying to work on answering some of Steve's original 
observations about the Ooton Liatto case as well as some of the 
points in his reply. 

These items were posted BEFORE you asked your series of questions. 
My post ["Value in comparing the different interpretations", etc] 
from earlier today was in answer to some of Steve's negative 
comments. 

Brigitte, things take time. For example, when Paul Johnson first 
wrote to me in January 1993 asking for some feedback from me on 
certain matters, I was not able to provide substantial comments until 
I sent him a letter dated April 7 of the same year. But I did 
eventually give him my views and criticisms.

So if you are complaining after only the lapse of 6 days, I do not 
think I should drop what I'm currently working on to satisfy your 
demands. Again see what I wrote you 6 days ago: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/4265

But in looking through your questions again, are you SURE that you 
quoted verbatim what the NY WORLD article reported as Blavatsky's 
words? Or if you are simply quoting from Deveney then please be sure 
you are quoting the NY WORLD text accurately from Deveney book. 

Daniel
http://hpb.cc