Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00431)

Bart Lidofsky wrote in part:

". . . . They [Brigitte, Steve, and Daniel] have piles of shoddy 
logic, falsified history, and plain out and out lies to fall back on, 
and what they want is for people to argue with them so that they can 
pull out their full loads of ammo. And, if somebody does get the 
better of them, they simply ignore that person, and start all over 
again. . . .You know full well that it is easy to take statements out 
of context to change their meanings, or even take a statement in 
context which is contradicted by many other statements, yet ignore 
those other statements. Yes, one can take apart the arguments. But my 
life is too short to waste it dealing with hatemongers. I'd just as 
soon walk away. Which I have pretty much decided to do. And you know 
what kind of abuse I am capable of standing up to if I think that my 
efforts have a prayer of doing some good."

These are pretty strong words coming from Bart. From what he writes, 
it would appear that Bart (in contrast to the three persons he names) 
is in possession of the true logic, the true history and .... the 
truth. Or at least this is what he believes and claims. 

Why doesn't Bart ignore the "hatemongers" but share some of his logic 
and truth with the OTHER 160 + members of this group?

Instead Bart writes mere generalizations and threatens to leave the 
group if things don't change to his liking.

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://hpb.cc