Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00432)

Bart wrote:

"They [Brigitte, Steve & Daniel] have piles of shoddy logic, 
falsified history, and plain out and out lies to fall back on, and 
what they want is for people to argue with them so that they can pull 
out their full loads of ammo. And, if somebody does get the better of 
them, they simply ignore that person, and start all over again. How 
many times have you tried to go against Daniel, when all the 
ammunition you [Paul Johnson] have in your arsenal is the truth? And 
what good has it done?"

It is not often that I find statements which jump out at me and take 
my breath away! Bart's statement above is one of those rare gems.

For those readers who would like to have a different perspective on 
Paul's "arsenal of truth," I suggest they read and study the 
following essay:

"The Theosophical Mahatmas: A Critique of Paul Johnson's New Myth"
by David Pratt.
See: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/johnson.htm