Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00398)

Hi, Bill

Thanks.

Hi-ho Hi-ho

from
Sufilight


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Meredith" <bilmer@surfsouth.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re to Paul


> Alright Sufilight. neti neti.
> 
> ----------
> > From: Morten Sufilight <teosophy@mail1.stofanet.dk>
> > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: Theos-World Re to Paul
> > Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:00 AM
> > 
> > Hi Bill, and all of you,
> > 
> > Allright Bill. 
> > I didn't say, that you didn't see what you claimed you saw.
> > I didn't say, that your post wasn't about Jesus.
> > I didn't say, that you had said that Christ was a joke.
> > I didn't say, that Maya can make things and events look real - even if
> they really are not.
> > 
> > Can you agree upon that?
> > 
> > To me Christ isn't a joke.
> > 
> > 
> > from Sufilight
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Bill Meredith" <bilmer@surfsouth.com>
> > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: Theos-World Re to Paul
> > 
> > 
> > > My post was about an event of which I am a credible witness. The story
> is
> > > true to the best of my recollection. My post was not about Christ. 
> Did I
> > > say anywhere that Christ was a joke? See how easily one's
> prejudgements
> > > dance upon the scene?
> > > 
> > > Bill
> > > ----------
> > > > From: Morten Sufilight <teosophy@mail1.stofanet.dk>
> > > > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: Re: Theos-World Re to Paul
> > > > Date: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:39 PM
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Laughs...
> > > > 
> > > > Well - do - I think? Do - I - think?
> > > >  
> > > > What do you want?
> > > > Have you found anything wet - to be historical examined?
> > > > 
> > > > Christ is no joke - so please....Bill....
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > from Sufilight
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > From: "Bill Meredith" <bilmer@surfsouth.com>
> > > > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:33 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Theos-World Re to Paul
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > What Jerry writes below reminds me of my first philosophy professor
> > > many
> > > > > years ago. In a large southern university smack in the middle of
> > > southern
> > > > > baptist country, Dr. W tossed out for consideration the question of
> > > whether
> > > > > Jesus ever had sex, or masterbated, or had a wet dream, or awakened
> > > with an
> > > > > erection. Dr. W never said these things were true, but the roar of
> > > young
> > > > > christian students defending the 'son of man' was deafening.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I wonder what Sufilight thinks of this story?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bill
> > > > > 
> > > > > ----------
> > > > > > From: Morten Sufilight <teosophy@mail1.stofanet.dk>
> > > > > > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Theos-World Re to Paul
> > > > > > Date: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:31 PM
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi Jerry, and you all,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Jeery wrote:
> > > > > > And why do some get so upset over the idea that Blavatsky may
> have
> > > used
> > > > > drugs? Does this picture knock her off her pedestal? How? I suspect
> > > that we
> > > > > all can agree that she cussed and smoked and traveled cross-country
> > > with
> > > > > men, so her pedestal has to be somewhat tarnished anyway. This
> whole
> > > > > business may suggest more for her followers than for Blavatsky
> herself.
> > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > *******
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Well Jerry - one wonders why?? What do you your self think - it
> could
> > > be,
> > > > > that makes people so upset?
> > > > > > Please Jerry - you who are so wise - please help us out here - on
> > > this ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > (And please - to all readers - I am not against a good story. But
> if
> > > it
> > > > > is bad, then the owen gets hot.)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > Sufilight
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > > From: "Gerald Schueler" <gschueler@earthlink.net>
> > > > > > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:20 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Theos-World Re to Paul
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > <<<Spirituality that is not in conflict with clear awareness of
> > > history
> > > > > and all it reveals about human weakness and delusion.  
> > > > > > > Paul>>>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I agree with you, Paul. I have enjoyed most of the historical
> > > debates,
> > > > > even though I don't usually care much for history. I found
> Brigitte's
> > > > > history of the early TS fascinating. Also, I have enjoyed both of
> your
> > > > > books.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The problem seems to be that some Theosophists have already
> placed
> > > > > Blavatsky on a divine pedestal and can't accept the fact that she
> was
> > > human
> > > > > like everybody else. Also, while some Theosophists preach
> compassion,
> > > they
> > > > > really aren't much different from book-burning fundamentalist
> > > Christians.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hopefully a dispassionate history debate can continue. And why
> do
> > > some
> > > > > get so upset over the idea that Blavatsky may have used drugs? Does
> > > this
> > > > > picture knock her off her pedestal? How? I suspect that we all can
> > > agree
> > > > > that she cussed and smoked and traveled cross-country with men, so
> her
> > > > > pedestal has to be somewhat tarnished anyway. This whole business
> may
> > > > > suggest more for her followers than for Blavatsky herself. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I think Brigitte may be on to something when she suggests that
> male
> > > > > chauvinism may have played a part in her Masters. Why shouldn't we
> > > discuss
> > > > > these kind of possibilities?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Jerry S.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> > 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
>