RE: Theos-World time to review how theos-talk operates
Nov 02, 2001 12:42 PM
|From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
|Sent: Saturday, 3 November 2001 6:20 AM
|Subject: Re: Theos-World time to review how theos-talk operates
|It's not surprising that you took my impersonal answer to your
I'm sorry - I thought it was pretty much aimed at me coz' of all the
political stuff I've been posting. My mistake.
As usual, your statements, mostly disguised in
|the form of self
|justifying or snide questions, show a profound ignorance of
Ummmm...no It's just a different MO. For example - I use 'pen-name'
because I don't wish to develop my ego. I'm not out to make a 'name for
myself'. A devil's advocate should remain objective.
|"Character" is the higher nature of the real individuality
|the "artificial construct" of the lower nature or *personality*.
Sorry could you give me a page in ISIS for this so I canstudy upon it?
|individual is responsible for their own character and personality. To
|"destroy" either one, belonging to someone else, is not the
|those wishing to play God.
I don't think that was the point though was it?
Such Hubris is one of the "seven
|leading to one's own bad karma. 'One must see to their own
|they judge the faults of another' is the teaching of all the
|great Masters of
|Wisdom. Therefore, it behooves one to think before one speaks...
|In a message dated 11/02/01 10:03:16 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
|>Character assassination? Isn't the character an artifical construct -
|>to destroy it not beneficial? ;)
See that little winky emoticon just /\ there - that means nudge nudge
I seriously thought that anyone that really knows anything knows that
everythings Maya and all this is just a big joke. Seriously.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application