Theos-Talk Archives (July 2001 Message tt00218)

>days. I see that in some cases my meanings have not been
>grasped.

Dallas, openly said that is exact what I get in private mails from other
readers about your emails.
Some were saying that in the ULT there is free and unbiased information flow
from above to below, but it looks rather like strong limitation. Your today
answer to that serious arguments and detailed questions is only a
parrot-like uplisted of what the aims of the ULT are:

>2. Provide a free forum at which the original teachings could be
>discussed in a regular, harmonious and expectant mode.

Do you think you did understand the questions several persons, including
myself, have?

So I ask you again: If I become a ULT member will it be allowed in your free
forum that I believe that Katherine Tingley was a messenger of original
teachings and that Robert Crosbie was wrong in condeming her? Would the ULT
member, would you welcome me in harmony? Would you allow that I prsent my
standpoint openly in your magazine so that the members can come to their own
conclusion over information which were hidden away from them until now?

Please answer simply: Yes, no or perhaps - and please don't send further
commercials or declarations.

>Let's take it for granted that every organization using the word
>"Theosophical" is trying in its own way to point to the value

The ULT is an excerption as they have a "Theosophy Company".

>U.L.T. seeks to make the ideals of universal Theosophy
>practical.

Does that include opposition from sectarian views as she always was fighting
aginst?

>Some desire to review if not rewrite history. But history is

YES! I for one! The ULT history must be rewritten and more truth included.
Is that bad?

>Why should the magazines offer anything different? All I can say
>is that no one who submits an article, a question or a
>speculation, need expect to find either complete acceptance or
>total rejection. Sometimes opinions are offered, and sometime no
>one ever hears anything at all. All writing is deemed to be in
>the service of mankind.

When the ULT is open, searching for truth (if they doesn't actually have it)
and free WHY do we find over decades no point of view which different? Say
about Katherine Tingley or Judge?
Do you want me to say that an uniform presentation of opinions is a sign for
freedom? If you say yes, then, to be true to your standpoint, you say also
that Cubanian newspapers are more free then US newspapers?
Frank