Theos-Talk Archives (November 1998 Message tt00159)

>Elsie Benjamin was head of the Corresponding Lodge
>of Theosophists, if remember correctly. I received monographs
>from that Lodge in England for several years until her passing.
>It was curious that in one of her papers she insisted that
>the word "Solar Logos" wasn't in the SD and that it was
>a neologism of CWL. However, the Solar Logos is found
>in the SD even though it's mentioned only once.
>
>Best Wishes,
>Augoeides


The first think one should learn in the domain of occultism is the right
discrimination. Elsie was well aware of the fact that the term Solar Logos
is in the SD as she was an intimate student of HPB's writing and of the ML
as
well. But the point is that CWL describes the Logos which whom he will have
talked regularly as a HE and the genuine Theosophy supports neither the
anthropomorphism of the Christian church nor the other strange inventions
around that matter CWL has invented and selled to the innocents as
"Theosophy". A clear and quick understanding of CWL's new inventions so
contradict to Theosophy are to be found in Margaret Thomas: "Theosophy vs.
Neo-Theosophy". Everyone who tries to understand what Theosophy is and what
is it not should careful read it. It is eye-opening.

Frank