Theos-Talk Archives (August 1998 Message tt00301)

August 17th 1998

Dear Paul:

Many thanks -- I learn more interesting things.  Isn't the inter-relation of
numbers and ratios a valuable tool ?

Best wishes,

Dallas

> Date: Sunday, August 16, 1998 11:49 AM
> From: "Bazzer (Paul)" <bazzer@co.uk>
> Subject: Re: Adepts are Maya

>W. Dallas TenBroeck wrote:
>
>> This process was apparently done some 18,000,000 + years ago.  We are
just
>> past the mid-way point in this Manvantara.  [ Very few exact figures are
>> given to us in the SD.  HPB says that these occult figures are withheld
as
>> calculations on them might be dangerous and also inconclusive without
some
>> information we are yet to acquire.  the figures given in SD II 68-70 she
>> says are based on the Brahmanical, and if we examine the cycles of time
>> indicated there they appear to be based on the figure 60:
>>
>> as in 60 x 60 = 360;  360 x 60 x 12 = 432,000;  and so on all
multiples --
>> but she says that those are not the TRUE FIGURES.
>
>First print of SD has the figure "60" 'missing' on page sixty.
>
>"These "Eternities" belong to the most secret calculations, in which, in
>order to arrive at the true total, every figure must be 7x (7 to the
>power of x); x varying according to the nature of the cycle in the
>subjective or real world; and every figure or number relating to, or
>representing all the different cycles from the greatest to the smallest
>- in the objective or unreal world - must necessarily be multiples of
>seven. The key to this cannot be given, for herein lies the mystery of
>esoteric calculations, and for the purposes of ordinary calculation it
>has no sense." (SD, I, 36). NB: 36 x 10 = 360; 3 + 6 + 0 = 9 etc..
>
>Further on we find:-
>
>"The Three, the One, the Four, the One, the Five" (in their totality -
>twice seven) represent 31415 - the numerical hierarchy of the
>Dhyan-Chohans of various orders, and of the inner or circumscribed
>world.  When placed on the boundary of the great circle of "Pass Not"
>(see Stanza V), called also the Dhyanipasa, the "rope of the Angels,"
>the "rope" that hedges off the phenominal from the noumenal Kosmos, (not
>falling within the range of our present objective consciousness); this
>number, when not enlarged by permutation and expansion, is ever 31415
>anagramatically and Kabalistically, being both the number of the circle
>and the mystic Svastica, the twice seven once more; for separately, one
>figure after another, whether crossways, from right or from left, they
>will always vield fourteen.  Mathematecally they represent the
>well-known calculation, namely, that the ratio of the diameter to then
>circumference of a circle is as 1 to 3.1415, or the value of the [symbol
>of pi here] (pi), as this ratio is called - the symbol [symbol of pi
>here] being always used in mathematical forulae to express it.  This set
>of figures must have the same meaning, since the 1:314,159, and then
>again 1:3:1,415,927 are worked out in the secret calculations to express
>the various cycles and ages of the "first born," or 311,040,000,000,000
>with fractions, and yield the same 13,415 by a process we are not
>concerned with at present." (SD, I, 90/91).
>
>3 x 1 x 4 x 1 x 5 = 60.
>
>SD, II, 621/622 states (NB: text in square brackets are italics in
>original and some words are larger):-
>
>"THE CIRCLE IS NOT THE "ONE" BUT THE ALL.
>IN THE HIGHER [heaven] THE IMPENETRABLE RAJAH ["ad bhutam," see
>Atharva-Veda" X., 105], IT [the Circle] BECOMES ONE, BECAUSE [it is] THE
>INDIVISIBLE, AND THERE CAN BE NO TAU IN IT.
>IN THE SECOND [of the three "Rajamsi" (triteye), or the three "Worlds"]
>THE ONE BECOMES TWO [male and female]; AND THREE [add the Son or logos];
>AND THE SACRED FOUR ["tetractis", or the "Tetragrammaton."]
>IN THE THIRD [the lower world or our earth] THE NUMBER BECOMES FOUR, AND
>THREE, AND TWO.  TAKE THE FIRST TWO, AND THOU WILT OBTAIN SEVEN, THE
>SACRED NUMBER OF LIFE; BLEND [the latter] WITH THE MIDDLE RAJAH, AND
>THOU WILT HAVE NINE, THE SACRED NUMBER OF BEING AND BECOMING".*
>
>No wonder we have problems getting Occultism to "add up"!:-)
>
>Best wishes,
>Paul (Bazzer)
>
>
>
>