Theos-Talk Archives (June 1998 Message tt00585)

At 11:05 AM 6/25/1998 EDT, you wrote:
>In a message dated 98-06-25 09:41:04 EDT, Daniel Caldwell writes:
>
><< You may not appreciate these references but I and other readers may find
>the citations useful for our individual studies. I hope  Dallas *will
>continue* to quote and cite material that he thinks is appropriate to the
>given discussion.
>
>  Also I believe Dallas has a right to say that he believes HP Blavatsky is
>*knowledgeable* and/or *correct* on a given point or subject. This is not the
>same thing as claiming that HPB is giving out "inviolate, certain and
absolute
>truth"!! >>
>
>I agree, Daniel. The Internet is a free forum. Dal has the right to quote and
>comment from an HPB-Judge perspective. I'm an eclectic theosophist,
myself, so
>I find post-Blavatskyian authors valuable as well. Others may not agree but
>we're not within the confines of an organization here.
>
>My two bits
>Lmhem111

Well said. The moment *any* organization gets into the picture, *control*
comes in no matter however much they try not to. The fundamental strength,
much to the dismay of many organizational types, of Internet is the
unfettered freedom to express your opinions and ideas.

mkr