Re: Statute of limitations
Jun 02, 1998 10:21 AM
by Daniel H Caldwell
K. Paul Johnson wrote:
> It's actually over seven years since my hypotheses about HPB and
> the Masters first were printed. Although the interest of some
> people in denouncing and/or trying to refute them appears
> undiminished, my own interest in the subject is much reduced. In
> the past month I've been allowing myself to get dragged back into
> disputes with Theosophical fundamentalism, but that's not really
> a suitable channel for anyone's energy. Although it can be gratifying
> to "win" in the estimation of onlookers, one can very rarely win with
> fundamentalists of any kind in the deeper sense of getting them
> to reexamine their belief system.
> As the publication of the Cayce book approaches, it's time to
> focus on that rather than past writings and reactions to them.
> So I won't be publicly debating about the Masters or HPB on the theos
> lists or anywhere else henceforth. If anyone wants information
> or opinions from me on that score, I'll be glad to oblige by
> private email, however.
> And will stay on the lists to comment occasionally on other
Daniel Caldwell replies:
Let me know when I can get a copy of the Cayce book.
Paul, it's too bad that you won't be commenting publicly on these
I was hoping Blavatsky students would deal DIRECTLY
with the 3 alleged "untruths" by you and Jerry S.
Instead of that, Dallas and Jerry HE beat round the bush and deal
with everything but these three items! I am still hoping that
theosophical/Blavatsky students will try their hand at dealing
*specifically* with these three "untruths". If somebody does, I hope
you and Jerry S will likewise respond. I promise to post all responses,
on the web site so others may read and possibly LEARN something from
such give and take.
Again here is the information about the web site:
BLAVATSKY'S ALLEGED "UNTRUTHS"
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application