Re:Usefulness of the list
Mar 07, 1998 03:59 PM
by Jerry Hejka-Ekins
The number of different viewpoints and attitudes in this world never fails to amaze
me. There are those who want to see nothing but high minded phrases and platitudes;
others who prefer to ignore dysfunctionality; those who are not vested in the
organizations and want to discuss teachings; those vested in the organizations who
want to talk about improving them, or treating their dysfunctionality etc. Too bad
we can't have a list for everyone:
1. theos-platitudes
2. theos-theos_philosophy
3. theos-neo_theos_philosophy
4. theos-TS_org_support
5. theos-TS_org_opposed
Until then, I guess we all have to share the same lists and whatever orientation
gets the most response, will be the one that gets the most bandwidth. Of course,
there is also ts_l, where never a critical word is ever heard. But there is never
much activity there. Wonder why.....
jhe
Bjorn Roxendal wrote:
> Although understandable, I feel it is unfortunate that so much energy goes into
> the discussions about the problems with the theosophical leadership. It seems to
> me that the people who are whining about it get limited and drawn down in
> consciousness. All of us have access to these wonderful teachings. Lets take
> them, each one of us, and make our lives expressions of them. Lets fid the
> activities where we can make a difference! If this or thatTheosophical
> organization is dysfynctional, lets just move on and get on with our lives and
> path.
>
> Bjorn
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application