Theos-Talk Archives (January 2012 Message tt00158)

I can see that. Looks like you just enjoy being extremely condescending.

On Thursday, January 19, 2012, Mark  Jaqua <hozro@lFTL1Q0eZfXfAbkSMI03il_6NHyigNW734SFYpVcp5Mg12jywxrNIL6AT8yRSJBnHDUM1zSNr7UmLQ.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> That's all right Morten, you don't have to agree with me, and beyond
disputing something, I don't think it is worthwhile nor wish to try to
convince any one of anything.
> - jake j.
>
> ----------------
>>1b. Re: Non-Sectarianism??
> Posted by: "M. Sufilight" global-theosophy@1_9v_azIXLGtj93WpF3Tc8QmXlEDgKbn0TLLpBQHw-6YYY1CDg5Hr9HvSD6qCgBP9rMIOaIYwI-QqJZswelfjsNU-A.yahoo.invalid kidhr7
> Date: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:58 am ((PST))
>
>>Dear Mark Jaqua and friends
>
>>My views are:
>
>>You wrote:
> "Well, Morten, Just more of your multi-page BS, and the "same ol', same
ol'" fog screen and dissimuilation (which is a psychological term also, I
see, as well as referring to arguement-style), and avoiding main points."
>
>>M. Sufilight says:
> Lets keep a civil tone of voice.
> I am open-minded on the idea that you might be able to learn me something
- provided that you are able to forward some examples that will make your
view solid. And not only assertions.
>
>>You wrote:
> "I forgot to add, among the other ignored points, that your ersatz
"non-sectarian" stance is anti-Discrimination - Discrimination being
perhaps the greatest developed attribute for the spiritual path - and
productive of the same type of paralysis of the reason, discrimination,
that I've seen in the Alice Bailey writing style and books."
>
>>M. Sufilight says:
> I am not sure I understand what you are actually saying here. I am
open-minded on the idea that you might be able to learn me something -
provided that you are able to forward some examples that will make your
view solid. And not only assertions.
>
>>You wrote:
> "I identify with Blavatsky Theosophy, and consider you an enemy of this
view, or rather Know it."
>
>>M. Sufilight says:
> I am open-minded on the idea that you might be able to learn me something
- provided that you are able to forward some examples that will make your
view solid. And not only assertions.
>
>>You wrote:
> Oh.... I am not your "friend."
>
>>M. Sufilight says:
> And you seek to promote altruism?
>
>>I hold it to be true, that an open-minded, well-intentioned and
well-meaning person with regard to Blavatsky's theosophy - hardly - can be
called a direct enemy of Blavatsky theosophy. Try to ask other members of
Theos-talk forum who has been here for 10 years or more whether I am in
opposition to Blavatsky or whether I seek to promulgate her teachings. I
think they will agree that I in fact seek to promote Blavatsky's teachings
- above and before - many other teachings; - to the best of my ability of
course. - As I see it: One thing is my personal views - another is my
organisational views.
>
>>Here is my private website - with my own personal views (not the
organisational views):
> (I have, for instance, on it the first full translation of the Key to
Theosophy, 2. ed. 1890, - in the Danish Language - frrely available.)
> http://www.global-theosophy.net/
>>Here is the forum I have created - based on the Original Programe for the
Theosophical Society given in 1875-1891.
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk-heart/
>
>>Maybe we just will have to agree on disagreeing, well perhaps even it
only is - apparently.
>>M. Sufilight
> ----------------
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]