theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: theos-talk Subtle Psychological Keys - Sectarianism or Politics in Lucist Trust and TS?

Oct 30, 2011 09:21 PM
by Cass Silva


According to Blavatsky
With the Buddhists, when Maitreya Buddha has come, then our present world will be destroyed; and a new and better one will replace it. The four arms of every Hindu Deity are the emblems of the four preceding manifestations of our Earth from its invisible state, while its head typifies the fifth and last Kalki Avatar, when this world will be destroyed, and the power of Budh, Wisdom, will be again called into requisition to manifest itself as a LOGOSÂto create the future world. The final destruction of the wicked, the renovation of "creation" and the "restoration of purity" will take place at the end of Kaliyuga, 427,000 years hence. The latter end of every yuga is called "the destruction of the world," as then the Earth changes each time its outward form, submerging one set of continents and upheaving another set.Â


It seems that Bailey is advocating this avatar in our age. Personally I don't accept it, as regardless of how many human thought forms are evoked, until and unless it is part of the cyclic karma of the world, it will not occur.
However this is only my personal opinion and doubt that the world will continue to spin or cease on my opinion! Âlol

Cass



>________________________________
>From: M. Sufilight <global-theosophy@DlnUkLv0WMLwXDQDix3BvPGTpZNhXzf7Gk3jO2CepRvjPHMgGjqsm4lsv71rdhjq_4mmfwe_2tRO4FyJ_aa6QAH3O2ai--U.yahoo.invalid>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011 12:53 AM
>Subject: Re: theos-talk Subtle Psychological Keys - Sectarianism or Politics in Lucist Trust and TS?
>
>
>Â 
>Dear Jeremy and friends
>
>My views are:
>
>I will gladly answer you, so to clairfy an unfortunate misunderstanding.
>
>What you say might be very well and true, although I find that Alice A. Bailey's books clearly promotes another view!
>See AAB's book "Problems of Humanity", p. 177 on support for the United Nations.
>
>But, I think you misunderstand a part of the post I gave. 
>I was thinking more in the lines of why most of the members come from Western countries. Could it have something to do with the Lucis Trust website and the westernized vocabulary in the Alice A. Bailey books which it so emphatically emphasises compared with all other books - except Foster Bailey's "Scottish" Freemasonry book - with his spurious 32 degree teachings, which are not esoteric at all in nature.
>
>I have my doubts about that Lucis Trust ever will have a large following in the Middle East, when the keep running an atavistic Savior program.
>See the following.......
>
>THE ATAVISTIC SAVIOR PROGRAM by LUCIS TRUST
>People are always looking for an Avatar or a Saviour; that does not mean that
>this is the time for an Avatar or a Christ Saviour. The problems that an Avatar or a Saviour would be
>able to resolve have not been identified. Nor does the clamor mean
>that those who cry out are suitable followers. Most of the people who
>demand an Avatar or a Christ Saviour seem to have some baby's idea of what an Avatar or a Saviour
>should do. The idea that an Avatar or a Christ Saviour will walk in and we will all
>recognize him, her or it (named a "hime" by AAB followers and not "it") and follow this being and everybody will be happy strikes me
>as a strangely immature atavism. Most of these people, I believe,
>want not an Avatar or a Christ Saviour but excitement. I doubt that those who cry the
>loudest would obey an Avatar or a Christ Saviour if there was one. Talk is cheap, and a
>lot of the talk comes from millions of beginner seekers after truth and wisdom.
>(Maybe the leaders at various esoteric groups would be kind to consider the above words. Okay?)
>
>World Invocation Day 2011 
>(by Lucis Trust) 
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkQvXEYeJLA&feature=relmfu
>
>All the above are of course just my views. I do not claim myself infallible as a "pope" or similar
>I do hope that at least some of it will be useful for something altruistic and good.
>
>M. Sufilight
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: Jeremy Condick 
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 10:06 PM
>Subject: RE: theos-talk Subtle Psychological Keys - Sectarianism or Politics in Lucist Trust and TS?
>
>M. Sufilight says:
>As for not being accepted with regard to political leanings. I wonder whether most members are from Middle Eastern countries? No? But, India then? No? And you do never wonder why?
>
>I assure the group that this would not be the case. Politics or religion do not enter into acceptance or non acceptance. JPC. 
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application