Theos-Talk Archives (April 2011 Message tt00010)

Taking care of one issue is not excuse for not taking care of the other, 
seeingÂthat one does not exclude the otherÂ. So, in my humble opinion, TS Adyar 
just does not want to step ou of its "confort zone" because an investigation 
such as this will give a lot of work, not mentioning it will have to admit that 
some theosophists envolved in the case were not true theosophists afterall. 

As as Morten would say, this is just my views.
Vera
 

________________________________

De: MKR <mkr777@N8vIPAo1RamAH1WqrDftFIaM9wkAeVOMwNy0KyYKf1oDo_7gPndy6E5gDRZBUWdqn-L2YMX1hoQWeQ.yahoo.invalid>
Para: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 1 de Abril de 2011 10:46:58
Assunto: Re: theos-talk Justice to Judge in 2011

While no one can judge what is important or not, in my humble opinion,
Theosophical movement faces more critical current issues for going forward
and in that declining membership outside India is a fact and I feel it
should be addressed by all, whether one belongs to one group or another or
none. Very little has been discussed in any forum, formal or informal and
come up with ideas to be tried. Most simple seems to be to visit India and
see what they are doing right which is yielding results year after year. It
is possible that some may be envious of the growth of theosophical
membership in India and that does not solve the declining membership issue.
In the largest section next to India, which is USA, we had 8,000 members in
1920 with no money, no property and today we have about 3,500 with millions
of dollars in the bank and very valuable property in Wheaton and in many
other cities. I think this is a very serious issue for the movement going
forward and we all should put our energies to address this.

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Erica L. Georgiades <eletzerich@lEMSvZed2Y2INGrsMSNJQ64ENaEV1sjQgx1k8_EBOKIxjwZLZz-Fo22iftuUndaOQVaVuFAhA8apfh0RSg.yahoo.invalid>wrote:

>
>
> One has no right to judge what is important for others or not. Learning
> from the
> past one may avoid future mistakes. Historical material cannot be kept
> unavailable for publication. History must be told and narrated on neutral
> grounds. At the moment that there is a group of persons, from all over the
> world, who consider important a review of Judge's case, to ignore them or
> even
> to suggest (as u do now) that their request is not relevant, is simply not
> democratic or right.
>
> ________________________________
> From: MKR <mkr777@N8vIPAo1RamAH1WqrDftFIaM9wkAeVOMwNy0KyYKf1oDo_7gPndy6E5gDRZBUWdqn-L2YMX1hoQWeQ.yahoo.invalid>
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, April 1, 2011 3:37:04 AM
> Subject: Re: theos-talk Justice to Judge in 2011
>
>
> In my humble opinion, the problems facing TS today is far more critical
> than
> what went on years ago. I think it is time to move on with problems at
> hand.
>
> MKR
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:17 PM, jdmsoares <jdmsoares@2eyJ5ZdIIbK2kUg9aXDTsr9cQAdyAahEL-pmIB0rPmsKGqhFr3JMScQ6upeEiHtLSo3JwyEvYKZWjWSv3do.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear friends,
> >
> > In the next days open letters will be send to Adyar, asking for the
> > re-examination of the accusation against William Judge, we have
> > published at our websites the text:
> >
> > Justice to Judge in 2011
> >
> > The Sixth Year of Open Letters to India
> >
> > The direct links are: http://www.theosophyonline.com/ler.php?id=220
> > <http://www.theosophyonline.com/ler.php?id=220> and
> > http://www.esoteric-philosophy.com/2011/03/justice-to-judge-in-2011.html
> > <http://www.esoteric-philosophy.com/2011/03/justice-to-judge-in-2011.htm|
> >Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic Messages in this
> topic
> >(2)
> >
> Recent Activity:
> Visit Your Group
> MARKETPLACE
> Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get
> the
> Yahoo! Toolbar now.
>
> ________________________________
>
> Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.
>
> Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest â Unsubscribe â Terms of Use
> .
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]