Theos-Talk Archives (March 2011 Message tt00137)

Dear Cass and friends

My views are:

Cass wrote:
"Morten, with respect, you know you have been monopolising by raising issues that are of concern to you, the political and administrative side of the TS society, the electronic media, etc. "

M. Sufilight says:
With respect Cass, in what manner can my emails be called monopolising more than any other email raising the opposite views or other views?

And real theosophical concepts is one thing, offered by each individual on their own, not as a secterian doctrine but as each individuals interpretation or view about the meaning of life, another, - is the frame which the Theosophical Society was build on, and its importance in promoting altruism - and by this aiming at reconciling "all religions, sects and nations under a common system of ethics, based on eternal verities." (The Key to Theosophy) - And throwing the latter issue out, I will not and cannot since altruism - cannot be promted through secterian activities - and that was also why the Theosohical Society from its very beginning was against the even today very common tendencies of secterianizing of the Theosophical Society and its aims. 

These are my views. And since they are promoted by the H. P. Blavatsky as a co-founder of the Theosophical Society - and - as I have shown also by words given by W. Q. Judge (and it can be shown in Olcott's words also), I find that I at least am in agreement with the Theosophical Society as it was given in 1875-1891 and perhaps later; but not since 1908. Because since 1908 we find that the Article XIII had been removed from the Contitution and Rules of the Society - and - that the Esoteric Section was turned into a tool for the promotion of secterian doctrine within the Theosophical Society. 

All the above are just my views.
And I might be in error, since I do not claim myself infallible like a Pope or similar.


Cass wrote:
"In the early days there were many many new people that joined in and asked relevant questions concerning theosophy, they have all disappeared now, and my opinion, is that they saw only a barren wasteland of mediocrity and political opinion."

M. Sufilight asks:
But, how can this view of yours be important with regard to the promotion of altruism - and the problems araising by removal of the Article XIII, and the ORIGINAL aims of the Theosophical Society as they were given in 1875-1891, and not as they were given after 1908?




M. Sufilight
 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Cass Silva 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 2:36 AM
  Subject: Re: theos-talk Charity among the theosophists


    
  Morten, with respect, you know you have been monopolising by raising issues that are of concern to you, the political and administrative side of the TS society, the electronic media, etc.  Blavatsky spent one percent of her time on these issues and 99 percent of her time on real theosophical concepts.  If you truly want to see the TS progress then I suggest that the discussions centre around TS concepts and not the affiliations of certain members or their agendas. 
   
  In the early days there were many many new people that joined in and asked relevant questions concerning theosophy, they have all disappeared now, and my opinion, is that they saw only a barren wasteland of mediocrity and political opinion.
  Cass

  --- On Fri, 18/3/11, M. Sufilight <global-theosophy@m_RCm_dMZyKp1TAT6rw64v_ytDpsCV9tTFbPXb6CG_gtLmN5lqAK_-6735xGMuVMoDaD-1FA0KikY8s7uI3u8XdfPifW4w.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

  From: M. Sufilight <global-theosophy@m_RCm_dMZyKp1TAT6rw64v_ytDpsCV9tTFbPXb6CG_gtLmN5lqAK_-6735xGMuVMoDaD-1FA0KikY8s7uI3u8XdfPifW4w.yahoo.invalid>
  Subject: Re: theos-talk Charity among the theosophists
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
  Received: Friday, 18 March, 2011, 5:23 AM

    

  Dear Cass and friends

  My views are:

  I was merely stating my views.
  I do not intend to monopolise in any manner what so ever.

  If you disagee with my views you could have the decency tell me and others why.
  But, your focus is somewhere else, I guess.

  M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Cass Silva 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:03 AM
  Subject: Re: theos-talk Charity among the theosophists

  My concern is with those monopolising the posts.
  Cass

  --- On Thu, 17/3/11, M. Sufilight <global-theosophy@m_RCm_dMZyKp1TAT6rw64v_ytDpsCV9tTFbPXb6CG_gtLmN5lqAK_-6735xGMuVMoDaD-1FA0KikY8s7uI3u8XdfPifW4w.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

  From: M. Sufilight <global-theosophy@m_RCm_dMZyKp1TAT6rw64v_ytDpsCV9tTFbPXb6CG_gtLmN5lqAK_-6735xGMuVMoDaD-1FA0KikY8s7uI3u8XdfPifW4w.yahoo.invalid>
  Subject: Re: theos-talk Charity among the theosophists
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
  Received: Thursday, 17 March, 2011, 2:53 AM

  Compassion is there among many a theosophical Seeker, - in various grades.
  Not all theosophical seekers at theos-talk email here all the time.
  And something is happening - people - are now much more rejecting nuclear energy production as it is at present.

  M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Cass Silva 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 4:52 AM
  Subject: Re: theos-talk Charity among the theosophists

  I wasn't thinking of the victims, I was thinking of the so called altruistic theosophists.
  Cass

  --- On Wed, 16/3/11, Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@wTbV_gG_49NbgqR-xqQYjbNCkznpTOzdKjuSsHr9a6tucvlyIXFybG3AUHS7Hj7QqScbbdmiP-JmC3CBjA.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

  From: Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@wTbV_gG_49NbgqR-xqQYjbNCkznpTOzdKjuSsHr9a6tucvlyIXFybG3AUHS7Hj7QqScbbdmiP-JmC3CBjA.yahoo.invalid>
  Subject: Re: theos-talk Charity among the theosophists
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
  Received: Wednesday, 16 March, 2011, 3:43 AM

  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva <silva_cass@...> wrote:

  > I have not read one word of compassion fromà theos talkà who have
  > not beenà effected by recent events in the world

  It would be just a pose or, in the best case, a foolish emotion, for no one of the sufferers reads theos-talk. Even if they had spare time and an access to internet, probably it would be the last thing they would do.

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]