Theos-Talk Archives (February 2011 Message tt00108)

In Tibet I can understand the reasoning, but in the US - seems odd to me.
Â
Cass



--- On Wed, 23/2/11, MKR <mkr777@C96HMCCm5l_XELEKq4l5Gdign_0EmGxto5n8HmpHcyQKunkPlI_5sS22CUlx2o3Q44JVPVvq_-NO.yahoo.invalid> wrote:


From: MKR <mkr777@C96HMCCm5l_XELEKq4l5Gdign_0EmGxto5n8HmpHcyQKunkPlI_5sS22CUlx2o3Q44JVPVvq_-NO.yahoo.invalid>
Subject: Re: theos-talk Theosophical Classics: Re: Update on Secret Doctrine Commentaries
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Received: Wednesday, 23 February, 2011, 1:12 AM


 



HPB traveled in the United States dressed like a male and I am sure it
worked when she visited Tibet as well.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:33 AM, M. Sufilight
<global-theosophy@zAgt_c59oz2E3P1_fRdLxGboL0K5At0tYwjsaurBJHIh0Tt5XVm24XY1z5GU5796NN70Pbv_XZL6LDxwNH3Jvt6WDhOn3Q.yahoo.invalid>wrote:

>
>
> Thanks.
> I had not read that one by Arthur Lillie.
>
> But I do find Arthur Lillie to be more or less ignorant, although he
> touches some very interesting historical events. His bewilderment about
> Blavatsky entering Tibet in 1856 - can be cleared by the fact that she
> passed as a male. She was very thin at that time, and with her looks and a
> bit of magic she succeded. (smile.) I also think something similar is
> written somewhere by her own hand.
>
> M. Sufilight
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Martin
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 11:54 PM
> Subject: Re: theos-talk Theosophical Classics: Re: Update on Secret
> Doctrine Commentaries
>
> Lol, I just found out Annie Wood Besant is family as well to my family (as
> is
> Blavatsky), my niece Nathaly Wood, named after the famous N.Wood, is
> daughter of
> a Scottish heir. The Wood family took its name in the 17th century after my
> own
> name 'Tak' which Anglified is Wood...
> Another thing to read is a maybe unknown writter Arthur Lillie, who wrote a
>
> interesting book on Blavatsky...found in the digital archives...
>
> http://ia700401.us.archive.org/16/items/madameblavatsky00unkngoog/madameblavatsky00unkngoog.pdf
>
> ________________________________
> From: MKR <mkr777@C96HMCCm5l_XELEKq4l5Gdign_0EmGxto5n8HmpHcyQKunkPlI_5sS22CUlx2o3Q44JVPVvq_-NO.yahoo.invalid>
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, February 21, 2011 11:27:22 PM
> Subject: Re: theos-talk Theosophical Classics: Re: Update on Secret
> Doctrine
> Commentaries
>
> Also there is the possibility of some one having downloaded the entire
> website. If so we can retrieve everything.
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:29 PM, John W <JohnWW@ssuz67EhtJDcpOr82aDiEI56LIyN7kUXj3X3SAEIptucsMS-AcIKpbBZQn-cmTBImdQjkjIMoTA.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Can you please tell us what were the titles that were on that site as PDF
> > or DJVU files? I would be able to search for downloads of them elsewhere
> on
> > the internet using Google. Also, what was the URL of the site that had
> them?
> > It may have been archived on http://www.archive.org , which also hosts
> > many old out-of-copyright Theosophical books as PDFs or DJVUs.
> >
> > John W.
> >
> > --- On Mon, 21/2/11, Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yaM6terwzHQmZjofDW7u_FOqAz70PdVdbix0NPYtphhlhykwmi5qlrA1mcOaaAnf8TnQr15xW730x6-4.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
> > From: Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yaM6terwzHQmZjofDW7u_FOqAz70PdVdbix0NPYtphhlhykwmi5qlrA1mcOaaAnf8TnQr15xW730x6-4.yahoo.invalid>
> > Subject: theos-talk Theosophical Classics: Re: Update on Secret Doctrine
> > Commentaries
> > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Monday, 21, February, 2011, 8:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
> >
> > Theosophical Classics:
> >
> > > Someone had uploaded it some time ago and it was on the net for a
> >
> > > couple of days before it was taken down due to copyright violation.
> >
> > > I am sure many theosophists have downloaded it before it was taken
> >
> > > down and seems to be making rounds.
> >
> > Really it was online for several months or even more with many other
> > copyrighted books but now the site is down.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]









      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]