Theos-Talk Archives (February 2011 Message tt00030)

Dear Sadhak,

Just nit-picking about your statement that,

"Unfortuntely his horoscope has been studied and analysed by many renowned astrologers in both India and the west. While they have all generally agreed on the uniqueness/greatness nobody has even come close to saying it was a horoscope incapable of this or that."

If we agree that Krishnamurti had a very radical view of the past and its role in consciousness, then, either:

a) this characteristic should be somewhere and somehow reflected in his chart, or

b) astrology is not as acurate as people think it might be.  

Another characteristic regarding K's relationship to the past, and which should be reflected in his chart--provided that astrology is acurate--is K's trait which gave rise to the dichotomy between his public statements about having forgotten his pre-1929 past and displaying in private settings he was quite capable of accessing his pre-1929 memories. 



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: sadhak1008 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:29 PM
  Subject: theos-talk Re: The Messiah and Pope crutch...and its Descendants- smile


    

  -- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Govert Schuller" <schuller@...> wrote:
  >
  > Sadhak asked:
  > 
  > "Do these folks have a memo to this effect from Maitreya as well?!"
  > 
  > To which I can answer: Yes, they do!

  I knew they would! I am waiting for somebody to say they dont. Now that amount of honesty would sure surprise me!

  www.alpheus.org/html/source_materials/scott_anrias/maitreya_da.html
  > 
  > You who have studied the horoscope of Krishnamurti know that he is incapable of compromising with the past; also that he was reinforced 

  Unfortuntely his horoscope has been studied and analysed by many renowned astrologers in both India and the west. While they have all generally agreed on the uniqueness/greatness nobody has even come close to saying it was a horoscope incapable of this or that. So this seems another dubious piece of work. No surprises here!



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]