theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: theos-talk Re: Aurobindo's madman?

Oct 11, 2010 09:05 AM
by Drpsionic


No, there isn't one on Second Life.
 
Chuck the Heretic
 
_www.charlescosimano.com  

 
In a message dated 10/10/2010 11:16:08 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
mkr777@WBrn3qU2K0MSeVdJnJgF3lGl9ovquapuXTgDNVPL1pyrmEWGHKAHLcnLoipUwRiRM9XA7STShA.yahoo.invalid writes:

 
 
 
It is not already there?

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:42 AM, <




_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _Drpsionic@gZwFRv9WCOOfEztLR1IS1JPRnVniKZR61YkN6L6NVw2Ul-wXs4naOA9bNCJy5D9KLrFrsHLpKbg.yahoo.invalid_ 
(mailto:Drpsionic@DQfZKbC39b35m6sHSTwE-uh2NNEs2I_GzzeaoUWTukhyMEHMXjapNf2S2xdnvFhjqKV5zFeSkw.yahoo.invalid) _> wrote:

>
>
>  I have considered forming a Theosophical Society on Second  Life.
>
>
> Chuck the Heretic
>
>  www.charlescosimano.com
>
> In a message dated 10/9/2010 2:11:40  P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _Mvandertak@K8Tbz39qaUrHqRkv0T2dqkBTUiW4bcLE1p8BhTsBqwUvME8g9FJTnQFwoIss-Z9l1oAzikY_h7GSG_E.yahoo.invalid_ 
(mailto:Mvandertak@_7lZyCj2ewoX9kDQiPMhz_jgvLFQTFfEabq3wRYk42LBEDu89UOj-0eQOs4YGwwlmOqzou08kfQjDHmwpCxB.yahoo.invalid) _ <Mvandertak%40yahoo.com>  writes:
>
> "Stolen"? Hahaha, No one owns a thing here in this  Universe, thats why 
the
> seperated beings try to keep things for  themselves...We all poor from the
> One
> Intelligence, our minds  and bodies are made by the Sun, Moon(hidden
> planet, 8th
>  dimesion/sphere) and the Earth and our Intuition descended from the  
Cosmic
> Heart...We do not live, we are lived and therefore have to  cooperate and
> share
> what we find, if not ...suffering...  Buddha understood this best, that is
> why KH
> and others see Him  as the most holy of holy...pity He couldn't explain it
> to the
>  people of today, since all that inherrited His Teachings is selling
>  Bookists,
> not Buddhists... You may now understand why a Digital  Theosophical 
Society
> should be formed, since the unworthy people will  strand on pornsites 
while
> the
> others may find their way  toTheosophy...
>
> ________________________________
> From:  c_harles cosimano <
>
> _ (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _) _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
__Drpsionic@tQFwVns7HhoQdV3namC_EjE4VtrP-jpm2nQ_GHg_ZHbchQ9D6TaFxmx5oDaFuEN31fqakXXn-eWvAJKXESw.yahoo.invalid_ (mailto:_Drpsionic@gZwFRv9WCOOfEztLR1IS1JPRnVniKZR61YkN6L6NVw2Ul-wXs4naOA9bNCJy5D9KLrFrsHLpKbg.yahoo.invalid) _<_Drpsionic%40aol.com>_
>
>  (mailto:_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _Drpsionic@gZwFRv9WCOOfEztLR1IS1JPRnVniKZR61YkN6L6NVw2Ul-wXs4naOA9bNCJy5D9KLrFrsHLpKbg.yahoo.invalid_ 
(mailto:Drpsionic@DQfZKbC39b35m6sHSTwE-uh2NNEs2I_GzzeaoUWTukhyMEHMXjapNf2S2xdnvFhjqKV5zFeSkw.yahoo.invalid) _ <Drpsionic%40aol.com>)  _>
>
> To: _ (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _) _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
__theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:_theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) 
_<_theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>_
>
>  (mailto:_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) _ <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>)  _
> Sent: Sat, October 9, 2010 8:03:47 PM
>
> Subject: Re:  theos-talk Re: Aurobindo's madman?
>
> I think the key came in an  brief exchange in the Olcott Library many 
years
> ago.
> An  elderly lady was staying at Olcott for a short time, doing something
>  Theosophical, and she came into the library walked into the stacks and
>  asked why
> the writings of Alice Bailey were there, not because of any  objection to
> what
> they said, but because, as she said, they  were all stolen from the
> Esoteric
> Section  teachings.
>
> That alone would send them up the walls and over  the battlements.
>
> Chuck the Heretic
>
> _ (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _) __ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charlescosimano.com__ (http://www.charlescosimano.com_/) _
> (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _) _
>
> -----Original  Message-----
> From: kpauljohnson <_ (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _)
> _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) __kpauljohnson@AHVmEktpAnIUHb-dz3kh4LaYmfVkZVd8oTXGbs8gK2Fb3E02-P_WVM0wg5VV5pLTo6oG0e0gm9Y7PYM8sEI6sQ.yahoo.invalid_ 
(mailto:_kpauljohnson@a7rsA3oNr4BHFCLGI966_T54t29OeB8kzruOrTv6TQA3UAJLqQekqvAVluyaypvxFhYPCrgJ6-ywkHpcdKyfcw.yahoo.invalid) _ <_kpauljohnson%40yahoo.com>_  (mailto:
> _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _kpauljohnson@a7rsA3oNr4BHFCLGI966_T54t29OeB8kzruOrTv6TQA3UAJLqQekqvAVluyaypvxFhYPCrgJ6-ywkHpcdKyfcw.yahoo.invalid_ 
(mailto:kpauljohnson@x9lVkgPKeyuzUahUX8yYMjOnJ_XVSS8w50yw4amCwXVbpLPHwktsEWMAt_mhGgy9MFay0OGkmTxygnzLS7Kd614.yahoo.invalid) _ <kpauljohnson%40yahoo.com>)  _>
> To: _ (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _) _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
__theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:_theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) 
_<_theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>_
>
>  (mailto:_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com)  <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>)  _
> Sent: Sat, Oct 9, 2010 6:21 am
> Subject: theos-talk Re:  Aurobindo's madman?
>
> This was a very contemporary article to  have been written a hundred years
> ago!
> As for the "dethroning  of popes" that still is the main thing needed IMO.
> But
> now in  addition to an authoritarian mindset on behalf of the current
>  leadership,
> the popes of 100 years ago are untouchable, beyond  criticism, still
> enthroned
> even though long  dead.
>
> I would think that Morten and I agree about the relative  value of the
> writings
> of Leadbeater and Bailey compared to  those of HPB. I'd be equally
> disinclined
> to spend time on  either one, but if others in a group wanted to study 
them
>  would
> not object, just skip those classes. But the difference in the  TS is that
> nothing negative can ever said about the former, nothing  positive about
> the
> latter, without making The Powers That Be  extremely uncomfortable. What 
is
> it
> about Bailey in particular  that creates su_ch a paranoid atmosphere
> throughout
> the  TS?
>
> --- In _ (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _) _ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) __theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:_theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) 
_<_theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>_
>
>  (mailto:_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com)  <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>)  , 
Duane
> Carpenter <monad_monad_monad@...>
> wrote:
>  >
> > Great Article Jim
> > This extracted section of the  article really gave important insights.
> >
> > Aurobindo:  Claims of Theosophy
> >
> >
> > "If Theosophy is to  survive, it must first change itself. It must learn
> that
> >  mental rectitude to which it is now a stranger and improve its moral
>  basis. It
>
> > must become clear, straightforward, rigidly  self-searching, sceptical 
in
> the
> > nobler sense of the  word. It must keep the Mahatmas in the background
> and put
> >  God and Truth in the front. Its Popes must dethrone themselves and
>  enthrone the
> >
> > intellectual conscience of mankind. If  they wish to be mystic and 
secret
> like
> > our Yogins, then  they must like our Yogins assert only to the initiate
> and  the
>
> > trained; but if they come out into the world to  proclaim their mystic
> truths
> > aloud and seek power, credit  and influence on the strength of their
> assertions,
>  >
> _> then they must prove. It need not and ought not to be  suddenly or by
> miracles;
>
> >_ but there must be a  scientific development, we must be able to lay 
hold
> on  the
>
> > rationale and watch the process of the truths they  proclaim."
> >
> > Circa 1910/12
> >
>  >
> > ________________________________
> > From:  jamesbergh <jamesbergh@...>
> > To: _ (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _) _ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) __theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:_theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) 
_<_theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>_
>
>  (mailto:_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _theos-talk@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) _ <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>)  _
> > Sent: Fri, October 8, 2010 7:12:33 PM
> > Subject:  theos-talk Aurobindo's madman?
> >
> > Ã
> > I was  reading an article by Aurobindo, Claims of Theosophy at:
> >  www.aurobindo.ru/workings/sa/17/0015_e.htm
> >
> > He wrote  in 1910/12: ...The only member of the Theosophical Society who
>  could
> > give me any spiritual help I could not better by my unaided  faculties,
> was one
>
> > excluded from the esoteric  section because of his rare and potent
> experiences
> > were  unintelligible to Theosophical guides... one who meddled not in
> >  organizations and election cabals but lived like a madman,  
unmattavat."
> >
> > Could have been some other Chuck, but I  wonder who this soul may have
> been.
> >
> > Any  ideas?
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
>  >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have  been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]
>
> _ (_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charlescosimano.com/_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _)
>
> [Non-text portions of  this message have been removed]
>
> 
>

[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]

_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application