Theos-Talk Archives (October 2010 Message tt00049)

Are not all these keep us entertained and break the boredom?

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:39 PM, esapress@ThU99oA4ROzBuRifLmAUlHrVI_u4PdGzATPo7C4PqBojvn5kw59_YgHDTqhgVNkPfUFnH_0x0HfXNtc.yahoo.invalid <esapress@ThU99oA4ROzBuRifLmAUlHrVI_u4PdGzATPo7C4PqBojvn5kw59_YgHDTqhgVNkPfUFnH_0x0HfXNtc.yahoo.invalid>wrote:

>
>
> Thanks very much for the FYI; I think it's important to know/learn about
> these sorts of dramas as they're playing out.
>
> Other than that, really I'm more interested in news, like this for example,
> I thought it was a fascinating article:
>
> http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/94058?fp=1
>
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>, MKR
> <mkr777@...> wrote:
> >
> > In the recent issue of Quest (Fall 2010) - Journal of the TSA, there is
> an
> > interesting comment in pp. 155 which reads:
> >
> > ÃâËWhile there, (Rome), I did have an opportunity to meet with TS
> > International President Radha Burnier.
> > Although frail, she was amazingly strong in demeanor.
> > Our meeting was cordial, but she has apparently been affected by some of
> the
> > malefic accusations that have flown around the Internet against the
> American
> > Section in general and me in particularÃââ.
> >
> > I am glad that the International President was found to be amazingly
> strong
> > in demeanor. What a contrast compared to the chorus of allegations we all
> > heard during the last election where she was painted by those who wanted
> to
> > defeat her, as mentally and physically sick.
> >
> > The other item that caught the attention of many readers is the use of
> the
> > word ÃâËmaleficÃââ above. When I looked up the meaning of the word
> ÃâËmalefic.Ãââ
> > in the free online dictionary, here are the definitions:
> >
> > 1. Having or exerting a malignant influence.
> > 2. Evil; malicious.
> >
> > In the past couple of years, we have seen many messages here and in many
> > other Internet Forums, discussions about the electioneering tactics,
> > allegations about voting in the Indian Section, the failed ultra secret
> > attempt to disenfranchise all members, and the disunity seen in the
> General
> > Council meeting following the election.
> >
> > But we have not seen any malignant or evil or malicious statements about
> TSA
> > or any individual in TSA.
> >
> > Has anyone seen any messages elsewhere on Internet on the above issue or
> > could it be a simple misunderstanding or miscommunication?
> >
> > MKR
> >
> > There is no religion higher than Truth
>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]