Theos-Talk Archives (April 2010 Message tt00086)

On this I will agree.



What I find the a number of AAB followers are missing very often is the fact that if their Saviour or Avatar of the Avatars arrives in the Flesh, the physical, this Avatar of the Avatars can only arraive in accordance with the Law of Karma - and - NOT in accordance with more or less selfish lip-prayers, and NEITHER in accordance with the hope that this manifestation will be understodd by all mankind. Because due to Karma we will find thousands and in fact millions react with fear and suspicion about such a persons arrival and consider such to be an evil magician or teacher. This happened in the old days (Take Buddha and the Brahmans) and would happen again if it happened in these times of ours. And Karma does not permit the Avatars of the Avatars to help pople more than they are in spiritual NEED of - and that in opposition to what they spiritually WANT or desires in ignorance.


Please read this carefully:
People are always looking for an Avatar or a Saviour; that does not mean that
this is the time for an Avatar or a Saviour. The problems that an Avatar or a Saviour would be
able to resolve have not been identified. Nor does the clamor mean
that those who cry out are suitable followers. Most of the people who
demand an Avatar or a Saviour seem to have some baby's idea of what an Avatar or a Saviour
should do. The idea that an Avatar or a Saviour will walk in and we will all
recognize him, her or it and follow this being and everybody will be happy strikes me
as a strangely immature atavism. Most of these people, I believe,
want not an Avatar or a Saviour but excitement. I doubt that those who cry the
loudest would obey an Avatar or a Saviour if there was one. Talk is cheap, and a
lot of the talk comes from millions of old washerwomen.
(Maybe the leaders at various theosophical groups would consider the above section.)


M. Sufilight



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Duane Carpenter 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:05 PM
  Subject: Theos-World statement by DK via AAB on his work


    
  "I have told you much; yet at the same time I have told you nothing which would lead you to offer me that blind obedience and the foolish devotion which the emotional aspirant offers to the Guru and Master Whom he is as yet unable to contact. Nor will he make that desired contact until he has transmuted emotional devotion into unselfish service to humanityânot to the Master.
  The books that I have written are sent out with no claim for their acceptance. They may, or may not, be correct, true and useful. It is for you to ascertain their truth by right practice and by the exercise of the intuition. Neither I nor A.A.B. is the least interested in having them acclaimed as inspired writings, or in having anyone speak of them (with bated breath) as being the work of one of the Masters. If they present truth in such a way that it follows sequentially upon that already offered in the world teachings, if the information given raises the aspiration and the will-to-serve from the plane of the emotions to that of the mind (the plane whereon the Masters can be found) then they will have served their purpose. If the teaching conveyed calls forth a response from the illumined mind of the worker in the world, and brings a flashing forth of his intuition, then let that teaching be accepted. But not otherwise. If the statements meet with
  eventual corroboration, or are deemed true under the test of the Law of Correspondences, then that is well and good. But should this not be so, let not the student accept what is said."

  AUGUST 1934

  ________________________________
  From: Daniel <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tue, April 20, 2010 11:07:10 PM
  Subject: Theos-World "...the one and only God...was incarnated in...."

    
  Master Morya wrote the following to A.P. Sinnett:

  ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
  . . .[Rai Salig Ram and the other Radhasoami disciples] say and affirm that the one and only God of the Universe was incarnated in their [deceased] guru, and were such an individual to exist he would certainly be higher than any 'planetary' [spirit]. But they are idolators. . . .

  Their guru was no initiate only a man of extraordinary purity of life and powers of endurance. He had never consented to give up his notions of a personal god and even gods. . . . He was born an orthodox Hindu and died a self-reformed Hindu. . . . with no ambition to taint his bright soul. Many of us have regretted his self-delusion. . . .
  ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

  Quoted from:

  http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/mahatma/ml-40.htm

  For information on THE MAHATMA LETTERS TO A.P. SINNETT, see:

  http://mahatmaletters.net

  Daniel Caldwell
  Blavatsky Archives
  http://blavatskyarchives.com

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]