Theos-Talk Archives (February 2010 Message tt00256)

Explain yourself Chuck, 'no shift in climate conditions' but a cyclic change? 
The earth, like everything else, requires cleansing in order for it to continue to generate, therefore I see these climate changes as the means of doing this, and yes I agree, they are cyclic changes, some mini, some maxi.

Weather patterns can no longer be forecast beyond a few daysÂand it seems the forecasters are unable to determine the strength of those patterns.


Cass


>
>From: "Drpsionic@aol.com" <Drpsionic@aol.com>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Thu, 18 February, 2010 3:31:49 AM
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text]
>
>Â 
>I see no shift at all in climate conditions, merely a cyclic change that 
>happens every few hundred years.
>
>Nothing to be concerned about, certainly no reason to wreck civilization.
>
>Chuck the Heretic
>
>_www.charlescosiman o.com 
>
>In a message dated 2/16/2010 8:10:46 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
>silva_cass@yahoo. com writes:
>
>I have never accepted the global warming scenario, but we can see for 
>ourselves shifts in climate conditions. Who iyo is behind this 'socialist 
>stampede' and what would they benefit from a bankrupt developed Nation? How 
>would they benefit from a third world,underdevelope How would they benefit 
>from a 
>>
>>Never had any time for the UN either, other than the work that is 
>carried out by doctors and rescue workers sent to the scenes of recent 
>devastations. They call themselves a peace force yet continually send in troops to 
>oppose. 
>>
>>Cass
>>
>>From: "
>
>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _Augoeides-222@ Augoeides- 2_ 
>(mailto:Augoeides-222@ comcast.net) _" <_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) 
>_Augoeides-222@ Augoeides- 2_ (mailto:Augoeides-222@ comcast.net) _>
>>To: _ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _theos-talk@ yahoogrotheos- t_ 
>(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com) 
>>Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 4:59:21 PM
>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text]
>>
>> 
>>Cass, 
>>For me the answer is "YES" and here is the reasons why. This climate 
>fiasco is a well planned and organized "Socialist Stampede" calculated to 
>seriously injure, harm, disable the economy's of the developed Nations for the 
>benefit of the third world and underdeveloped Nations as well as the 
>Socialist bloc in effect to reorder the world order by means of punitive 
>restrictions, punishments, extorted monetary largess to those who are criminally 
>corrupted and who have shown no willingness to alter thier nations personal 
>histories of thiefing world bank, international monetary fund, United Nations 
>monies ( which are over 60 % United states contributions) while exempting 
>them all from the same standard they wish to have the western developed 
>nations subjected too. Perhaps you hadn't read the recent admittantances of 
>the so called Scientists at the United Nations and their scandalous 
>contributors so let me_ show you: 
>>
>>U. N. admits Himalaya Glacier Data Faulted 
>>
>>>>>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _http://www.terradai _ 
>(http://www.terradai /) _ ly.com/reports/ UN_climate_ panel_admits_ Himalaya_ 
>glacier_data_ poorly_substanti ated_999. html<<< 
>>
>>U. N. Report Riddled with Errors 
>>
>>>>>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _http://www.comcast. _ 
>(http://www.comcast. /) _ net/articles/ news-national/ 20100120/ SCI.UN.Climate. 
>Change/<<< 
>>
>>E-Letter to Bagla PDF File 
>>
>>>>>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _http://www.sciencem _ 
>(http://www.sciencem /) _ ag.org/cgi/ eletters/ 326/5955/ 924<<< 
>>
>>IPCC Doubts: only the tip of the iceberg 
>>
>>>>>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _http://www.terradai _ 
>(http://www.terradai /) _ ly.com/reports/ IPCC_Doubts_ Only_the_ Tip_of_the_ Iceberg_999. 
>html<<< 
>>
>>U.N. Climate Report Blunders again over Himalaya 
>>
>>>>>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _http://www.timesonl _ 
>(http://www.timesonl /) _ ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ environment/ article6999975. ece<<< 
>>
>>UN Climate Report based on Student Essay 
>>
>>>>>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _http://www.terradai _ 
>(http://www.terradai /) _ ly.com/reports/ UN_climate_ panel_based_ claims_on_ 
>student_essay_ report_999. html<<< 
>>
>>World may not be Warming say Scientists 
>>
>>>>>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) _http://www.timesonl _ 
>(http://www.timesonl /) ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ environment/ article7026317. ece<<< 
>>
>>This is a long way from over! The UN Head of the IPCC Panel has a well 
>paid unpublished Chairmanship on a major non-profit benefit from UN funding 
>and some believe it is very improper and should be looked into dilegently 
>and thoroughly. 
>>
>>There is a lot more that can be poijnted to including the Japanese 
>Protocol that was rejected years ago due to inherently unfair parameters while 
>leaving China, Russia and a lot others outside the protocal. India and China 
>compose tow Nuclear Powers that aspire to place the world under their 
>domain. Are we to lay down and submit like sheep? I dare say my finger is high 
>in the air lol! 
>>
>>Regards, 
>>John 
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Cass Silva" <silva_cass@ silva_cass> 
>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 5:15:17 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>
>>I hope its not going to take another Atlantis sinking before we realise 
>that the times they are a changin. 
>>
>>Cass 
>>
>>> 
>>>From: " Augoeides-222@ comcast.net " < Augoeides-222@ comcast.net > 
>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 11:52:38 AM 
>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>Cass, 
>>>CNN is a lot younger than I am lol. One of the main anchors on CNN once 
>said "Saudi Arabia doesn't even have an Army!" Lol. That was when Saudi 
>Arabia was the only buyer who saved the production of the US Abrams-II Tank by 
>buying it. The Pentagon didnt want to buy the now more capable version. 
>And If I remember there was earlier years where snow fall also covered at 
>least 48 states twice in the 20th century. 
>>>Regards, 
>>>John 
>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>From: "Cass Silva" <silva_cass@ yahoo. com> 
>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 3:51:58 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>> 
>>>According to CNN there is no recorded evidence that this has happened in 
>the past. 
>>>> 
>>>>Cass 
>>>> 
>>>>From: " Augoeides-222@ comcast.net " < Augoeides-222@ comcast.net > 
>>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>>Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 10:46:35 AM 
>>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>Chuck, 
>>>>Yep, 26 beow zero icy frozen everything, and that wonderful 50 mph 
>breeze blowing acroos thge 1/2 mile of ice on the shore of Lake Michigan begin 
>reaching any of us chicagoans lol!!! Sbow was higher than I was when I was 
>kid in Chicago. We used to grab a ride and shoe surf on the ice by holding 
>onto the back bumpers of the cars ! Wheee what fun!!! And the MONSTER 
>summer electrical storms amde my mom disappear because she was hiding in the 
>closet. And it was estatic to wake up drenched with wet sheets in the hot 
>summer time of Chicago. I also said "Whats the big deal?" we had snow like that 
>every year back on the 40-50's! 
>>>> 
>>>>John 
>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>From: Drpsionic@aol. com 
>>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 8:14:59 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
>>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>>> 
>>>>LOL! 
>>>> 
>>>>I can remember a number of years where 95% of the US was under snow and 
>>>>cold so bad it froze the oil in car engines. This year is nothing. Oh 
>the 
>>>>East Coast had a snow storm and the southerners got to make snowmen, 
>but I'm 
>>>>from Chicago, I live in Wisconsin and you ain't gonna impress me with 
>snow. 
>>>> 
>>>>As far as the planets being aligned with the Milky Way, the planets are 
>>>>always aligned with something. The Mayans were simply nuts, or is it 
>the 
>>>>folks who are taking them seriously who are nuts? Sorry, I'm not 
>impressed. 
>>>> 
>>>>Chuck the Heretic 
>>>> 
>>>>www.charlescosim www.charles
>>>> 
>>>>In a message dated 2/14/2010 7:35:43 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
>>>>silva_cass@ yahoo. com writes: 
>>>> 
>>>>Hi Chuck 
>>>>Seeing we have no recorded evidence of all the planets being in 
>alignment 
>>>>with the Milky Way (which is all the Mayans predicted) we have no way 
>of 
>>>>knowing what, or cannot predict, how or if this event will impact the 
>earth. 
>>>>We have had pole shifts in the past and survived them, we have had ice 
>and 
>>>>mini ice ages, so what I am saying, is not that the earth will be 
>>>>annihlated but what is causing these climatic changes such as 95 
>percent of the USA 
>>>>under snow? 
>>>> 
>>>>We have evidence of islands sinking and evidence of mountains 
>reemerging, 
>>>>and if a chamber was found in the sphinx foot it would suggest that it 
>was 
>>>>constructed to hold something which could have been removed. As Cayce 
>was 
>>>>a christian perhaps the Jesus thing was more about the Christos thing.? 
>
>>>> 
>>>>Are there no more clairvoyants left in the TS? 
>>>> 
>>>>Cass 
>>>> 
>>>>In AgnosticsRefuge@ yahoogroups. com, "HumanCarol" <humanist@> wrote: 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Unable to correctly attribute material to the correct author, 
>>>>mangummurdock <no_reply@> alleged: 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > > Richard Dawkins argues in Chap 3 of his book "The Dawkins 
>Delusion" 
>>>>that>> 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > It is already know that that is a lie. 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > << "it is more parsimonious to conjure up, say, a `Big Bang 
>>>>singularity' or some other physical concept as yet unknown" to account 
>for the 
>>>>existence of the universe. The word parsimonious is meaningless in 
>context: 
>>>>Whatever it might denote, how could it be measured? But conjure is the 
>right 
>>>>verb, suggesting as it does both misdirection and inattention. 
>Misdirection: 
>>>>The Big Bang singularity does not represent a physical concept, because 
>it 
>>>>cannot be accommodated by a physical theory. It is a point at which 
>physical 
>>>>theories give way. Inattention: The physical concept in which Dawkins 
>has 
>>>>placed his confidence is something that is either infinite and 
>inscrutable, 
>>>>or otherwise unknown. Men have come to faith on the basis of far les_s. 
>>>>This is, I suppose, not surprising. His atheism notwithstanding, 
>Dawkins 
>>>>believes that he is a "deeply religious man." He simply prefers an 
>alien cult.>> 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Why don't you correctly attribute that passage? 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Here is the context and a correct citation: 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > ---begin excerpt--- 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > > > 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>>> 
>>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>>> 
>>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>__________ _________ _<WBR>_ _ _________ _________ _________ _______
>>>Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, legally, 
>and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo. com.au/plus7 
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>
>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>
>____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
>Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, _legally, 
>and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo. Yahoo!7: 
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>_ (http://www.charlesc osimano.com/) 
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]