Theos-Talk Archives (February 2010 Message tt00238)

I have never accepted the global warming scenario, but we can see for ourselves shifts in climate conditions. Who iyo is behind this 'socialist stampede' and what would they benefit from a bankrupt developed Nation? How would they benefit from a third world,underdeveloped, poverty stricken nation?
>
>Never had any time for the UN either,ÂÂother than the work that is carried out by doctors and rescue workers sent to the scenes of recent devastations. They call themselves a peace force yet continually send in troops to oppose.Â
>
>Cass
>
>From: "Augoeides-222@comcast.net" <Augoeides-222@comcast.net>
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 4:59:21 PM
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text]
>
>Â 
>Cass, 
>For me the answer is "YES" and here is the reasons why. This climate fiasco is a well planned and organized "Socialist Stampede" calculated to seriously injure, harm, disable the economy's of the developed Nations for the benefit of the third world and underdeveloped Nations as well as the Socialist bloc in effect to reorder the world order by means of punitive restrictions, punishments, extorted monetary largess to those who are criminally corrupted and who have shown no willingness to alter thier nations personal histories of thiefing world bank, international monetary fund, United Nations monies ( which are over 60 % United states contributions) while exempting them all from the same standard they wish to have the western developed nations subjected too. Perhaps you hadn't read the recent admittantances of the so called Scientists at the United Nations and their scandalous contributors so let me show you: 
>
>U. N. admits Himalaya Glacier Data Faulted 
>
>>>>http://www.terradai ly.com/reports/ UN_climate_ panel_admits_ Himalaya_ glacier_data_ poorly_substanti ated_999. html<<< 
>
>U. N. Report Riddled with Errors 
>
>>>>http://www.comcast. net/articles/ news-national/ 20100120/ SCI.UN.Climate. Change/<<< 
>
>E-Letter to Bagla PDF File 
>
>>>>http://www.sciencem ag.org/cgi/ eletters/ 326/5955/ 924<<< 
>
>IPCC Doubts: only the tip of the iceberg 
>
>>>>http://www.terradai ly.com/reports/ IPCC_Doubts_ Only_the_ Tip_of_the_ Iceberg_999. html<<< 
>
>U.N. Climate Report Blunders again over Himalaya 
>
>>>>http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ environment/ article6999975. ece<<< 
>
>UN Climate Report based on Student Essay 
>
>>>>http://www.terradai ly.com/reports/ UN_climate_ panel_based_ claims_on_ student_essay_ report_999. html<<< 
>
>World may not be Warming say Scientists 
>
>>>>http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ environment/ article7026317. ece<<< 
>
>This is a long way from over! The UN Head of the IPCC Panel has a well paid unpublished Chairmanship on a major non-profit benefit from UN funding and some believe it is very improper and should be looked into dilegently and thoroughly. 
>
>There is a lot more that can be poijnted to including the Japanese Protocol that was rejected years ago due to inherently unfair parameters while leaving China, Russia and a lot others outside the protocal. India and China compose tow Nuclear Powers that aspire to place the world under their domain. Are we to lay down and submit like sheep? I dare say my finger is high in the air lol! 
>
>Regards, 
>John 
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Cass Silva" <silva_cass@yahoo. com> 
>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 5:15:17 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>
>I hope its not going to take another Atlantis sinking before we realise that the times they are a changin. 
>
>Cass 
>
>> 
>>From: " Augoeides-222@ comcast.net " < Augoeides-222@ comcast.net > 
>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 11:52:38 AM 
>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>> 
>> 
>>Cass, 
>>CNN is a lot younger than I am lol. One of the main anchors on CNN once said "Saudi Arabia doesn't even have an Army!" Lol. That was when Saudi Arabia was the only buyer who saved the production of the US Abrams-II Tank by buying it. The Pentagon didnt want to buy the now more capable version. And If I remember there was earlier years where snow fall also covered at least 48 states twice in the 20th century. 
>>Regards, 
>>John 
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Cass Silva" <silva_cass@ yahoo. com> 
>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 3:51:58 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>> 
>>According to CNN there is no recorded evidence that this has happened in the past. 
>>> 
>>>Cass 
>>> 
>>>From: " Augoeides-222@ comcast.net " < Augoeides-222@ comcast.net > 
>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 10:46:35 AM 
>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>Chuck, 
>>>Yep, 26 beow zero icy frozen everything, and that wonderful 50 mph breeze blowing acroos thge 1/2 mile of ice on the shore of Lake Michigan begin reaching any of us chicagoans lol!!! Sbow was higher than I was when I was kid in Chicago. We used to grab a ride and shoe surf on the ice by holding onto the back bumpers of the cars ! Wheee what fun!!! And the MONSTER summer electrical storms amde my mom disappear because she was hiding in the closet. And it was estatic to wake up drenched with wet sheets in the hot summer time of Chicago. I also said "Whats the big deal?" we had snow like that every year back on the 40-50's! 
>>> 
>>>John 
>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>From: Drpsionic@aol. com 
>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 8:14:59 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 
>>> 
>>>LOL! 
>>> 
>>>I can remember a number of years where 95% of the US was under snow and 
>>>cold so bad it froze the oil in car engines. This year is nothing. Oh the 
>>>East Coast had a snow storm and the southerners got to make snowmen, but I'm 
>>>from Chicago, I live in Wisconsin and you ain't gonna impress me with snow. 
>>> 
>>>As far as the planets being aligned with the Milky Way, the planets are 
>>>always aligned with something. The Mayans were simply nuts, or is it the 
>>>folks who are taking them seriously who are nuts? Sorry, I'm not impressed. 
>>> 
>>>Chuck the Heretic 
>>> 
>>>www.charlescosima n o .com 
>>> 
>>>In a message dated 2/14/2010 7:35:43 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
>>>silva_cass@ yahoo. com writes: 
>>> 
>>>Hi Chuck 
>>>Seeing we have no recorded evidence of all the planets being in alignment 
>>>with the Milky Way (which is all the Mayans predicted) we have no way of 
>>>knowing what, or cannot predict, how or if this event will impact the earth. 
>>>We have had pole shifts in the past and survived them, we have had ice and 
>>>mini ice ages, so what I am saying, is not that the earth will be 
>>>annihlated but what is causing these climatic changes such as 95 percent of the USA 
>>>under snow? 
>>> 
>>>We have evidence of islands sinking and evidence of mountains reemerging, 
>>>and if a chamber was found in the sphinx foot it would suggest that it was 
>>>constructed to hold something which could have been removed. As Cayce was 
>>>a christian perhaps the Jesus thing was more about the Christos thing.? 
>>> 
>>>Are there no more clairvoyants left in the TS? 
>>> 
>>>Cass 
>>> 
>>>In AgnosticsRefuge@ yahoogroups. com, "HumanCarol" <humanist@> wrote: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Unable to correctly attribute material to the correct author, 
>>>mangummurdock <no_reply@> alleged: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > > Richard Dawkins argues in Chap 3 of his book "The Dawkins Delusion" 
>>>that>> 
>>>> > 
>>>> > It is already know that that is a lie. 
>>>> > 
>>>> > << "it is more parsimonious to conjure up, say, a `Big Bang 
>>>singularity' or some other physical concept as yet unknown" to account for the 
>>>existence of the universe. The word parsimonious is meaningless in context: 
>>>Whatever it might denote, how could it be measured? But conjure is the right 
>>>verb, suggesting as it does both misdirection and inattention. Misdirection: 
>>>The Big Bang singularity does not represent a physical concept, because it 
>>>cannot be accommodated by a physical theory. It is a point at which physical 
>>>theories give way. Inattention: The physical concept in which Dawkins has 
>>>placed his confidence is something that is either infinite and inscrutable, 
>>>or otherwise unknown. Men have come to faith on the basis of far les_s. 
>>>This is, I suppose, not surprising. His atheism notwithstanding, Dawkins 
>>>believes that he is a "deeply religious man." He simply prefers an alien cult.>> 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Why don't you correctly attribute that passage? 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Here is the context and a correct citation: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > ---begin excerpt--- 
>>>> > 
>>>> > > > 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>___________ _ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ 
>>Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, legally, and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo. com.au/plus7 
>> 
>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>> 
>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


      __________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, legally, and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo.com.au/plus7

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]