Theos-Talk Archives (February 2010 Message tt00207)

Chuck, 
Yep, 26 beow zero icy frozen everything, and that wonderful 50 mph breeze blowing acroos thge 1/2 mile of ice on the shore of Lake Michigan begin reaching any of us chicagoans lol!!! Sbow was higher than I was when I was kid in Chicago. We used to grab a ride and shoe surf on the ice by holding onto the back bumpers of the cars ! Wheee what fun!!! And the MONSTER summer electrical storms amde my mom disappear because she was hiding in the closet. And it was estatic to wake up drenched with wet sheets in the hot summer time of Chicago. I also said "Whats the big deal?" we had snow like that every year back on the 40-50's! 

John 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Drpsionic@aol.com 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 8:14:59 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text] 






LOL! 

I can remember a number of years where 95% of the US was under snow and 
cold so bad it froze the oil in car engines. This year is nothing. Oh the 
East Coast had a snow storm and the southerners got to make snowmen, but I'm 
from Chicago, I live in Wisconsin and you ain't gonna impress me with snow. 

As far as the planets being aligned with the Milky Way, the planets are 
always aligned with something. The Mayans were simply nuts, or is it the 
folks who are taking them seriously who are nuts? Sorry, I'm not impressed. 

Chuck the Heretic 

www.charlescosimano.com 

In a message dated 2/14/2010 7:35:43 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
silva_cass@yahoo.com writes: 

Hi Chuck 
Seeing we have no recorded evidence of all the planets being in alignment 
with the Milky Way (which is all the Mayans predicted) we have no way of 
knowing what, or cannot predict, how or if this event will impact the earth. 
We have had pole shifts in the past and survived them, we have had ice and 
mini ice ages, so what I am saying, is not that the earth will be 
annihlated but what is causing these climatic changes such as 95 percent of the USA 
under snow? 

We have evidence of islands sinking and evidence of mountains reemerging, 
and if a chamber was found in the sphinx foot it would suggest that it was 
constructed to hold something which could have been removed. As Cayce was 
a christian perhaps the Jesus thing was more about the Christos thing.? 

Are there no more clairvoyants left in the TS? 

Cass 

In AgnosticsRefuge@ yahoogroups. com, "HumanCarol" <humanist@> wrote: 
> > 
> > Unable to correctly attribute material to the correct author, 
mangummurdock <no_reply@> alleged: 
> > 
> > > Richard Dawkins argues in Chap 3 of his book "The Dawkins Delusion" 
that>> 
> > 
> > It is already know that that is a lie. 
> > 
> > << "it is more parsimonious to conjure up, say, a `Big Bang 
singularity' or some other physical concept as yet unknown" to account for the 
existence of the universe. The word parsimonious is meaningless in context: 
Whatever it might denote, how could it be measured? But conjure is the right 
verb, suggesting as it does both misdirection and inattention. Misdirection: 
The Big Bang singularity does not represent a physical concept, because it 
cannot be accommodated by a physical theory. It is a point at which physical 
theories give way. Inattention: The physical concept in which Dawkins has 
placed his confidence is something that is either infinite and inscrutable, 
or otherwise unknown. Men have come to faith on the basis of far les_s. 
This is, I suppose, not surprising. His atheism notwithstanding, Dawkins 
believes that he is a "deeply religious man." He simply prefers an alien cult.>> 
> > 
> > Why don't you correctly attribute that passage? 
> > 
> > Here is the context and a correct citation: 
> > 
> > ---begin excerpt--- 
> > 
> > > > 
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]