Theos-Talk Archives (October 2009 Message tt00038)

Various radars have registeret Electric Balls. Some have seen Aurora Borealis.
Yes and the TV and its emissions in the local livingroom is quite interesting.
I have heard that some can actually "feel" the electric wires at the roadside, when they drive in the car. The countruyside has so much to offer: Birds singing, fresh air, less noise, a cleaner nature, real trees etc. etc.


HPB writes about Aurora Borealis:
Perhaps the above will be regarded as archaic nonsense, but it will be better comprehended, if the reader remembers the Aurora Borealis and Australis, both of which take place at the very centres of terrestrial and electric and magnetic forces. The two poles are said to be the store-houses, the receptacles and liberators, at the same time, of Cosmic and terrestrial Vitality (Electricity); from the surplus of which the Earth, had it not been for these two natural "safety-valves," would have been rent to pieces long ago. At the same time it is now a theory that has lately become an axiom, that the phenomenon of polar lights is accompanied by, and productive of, strong sounds, like whistling, hissing, and cracking. (S.D., I, 205).


"The Sun is the heart of the Solar World (System) and its brain is hidden behind the (visible) Sun. From thence, sensation is radiated into every nerve-centre of the great body, and the waves of the life-essence flow into each artery and vein ... the planets are its limbs and pulses ..." (S.D., I, 541).


M. Sufilight



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Christina 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 9:19 PM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: UFO's - The forbidden doctrine - electric balls and other atmospheric phenomena


    Never seen electric balls, but I see electricity through pylons, also see te GSM radiances.
  They only goes around that threads.
  Possibly it can be normal sight, but a lot of people are not aware of that.
  My son also see that radiances, so I am notthe only one in this case.
  People I know cannot see and think it is all illusion.

  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@...> wrote:
  >
  > Dear friends
  > 
  > My views are:
  > 
  > 
  > Materializations. 
  > "As Kâmaloka is on the earth plane and differs from its degree of materiality only in the degree of its plane of consciousness, for which reason it is concealed from our normal sight, the occasional apparition of such shells is as natural as that of electric balls and other atmospheric phenomena. Electricity as a fluid, or atomic matter (for Theosophists hold with Maxwell that it is atomic), though invisible, is ever present in the air, and manifests under various shapes, but only when certain conditions are there to "materialize" the fluid, when it passes from its own on to our plane and makes itself objective. Similarly with the eidola of the dead. They are present, around us, but being on another plane do not see us any more than we see them. But whenever the strong desires of living men and the conditions furnished by the abnormal constitutions of mediums are combined together, these eidola are drawn-nay, pulled down from their plane on to ours and made objective. This is Necromancy ; it does no good to the dead, and great harm to the living, in addition to the fact that it interferes with a law of nature. The occasional materialization of the "astral bodies" or doubles of living persons is quite another matter. These "astrals" are often mistaken for the apparitions of the dead, since, chameleon-like, our own "Elementaries", along with those of the disembodied and cosmic Elementals, will often assume the appearance of those images which are strongest in our thoughts. In short, at the so-called "materialization" seances it is those present and the medium, who create the peculiar likeness of the apparitions. Independent "apparitions" belong to another kind of psychic phenomena. Materializations are also called "form-manifestations" and "portrait statues". To call them materialized spirits is inadmissible, for they are not spirits but animated portrait-statues, indeed."
  > http://www.phx-ult-lodge.org/ALMNO.htm#m 
  > (TS Glossary by HPB, posthomusly published 1892)
  > 
  > 
  > A comment:
  > Now, all talk about "electric balls and other atmospheric phenomena" mentioned by H. P. Blavatsky (or perhaps G. R. S. Mead) are said to be denied publication at TS Adyar. The reason being that UFO's are a no no topic.
  > 
  > Any comments from TS Adyar on this?
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > M. Sufilight
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]