Theos-Talk Archives (September 2009 Message tt00074)

This is the most theosophical post I've seen in here for a long time and it gets down to cases in science and religion to get at the truth. I dont know about Cass but I for one still believe in a personal God, not an external one however.


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@...> wrote:
>
> Cass,
> 
> I don't think you are too far off the mark...
> 
> But, at the primal beginning of each cycle of manifestation, the  
> cosmos is in a state of rest -- which consists of its laya point of  
> pure consciousness (of absolute space) spinning in an angular  
> momentum of force rays that correspond to the total potential mass- 
> energy of each level of the past and future seven fold fractal  
> involved manifest fields of cosmic consciousness.
> 
> It's this laya point that Einstein called the "singularity" prior to  
> the birth of the spacetime continuum... And that the "new science" of  
> today sees as being in the center of every black-hole (now called a  
> "black-white whole" by Nassim Haramein) as well as in every zero- 
> point in total holographic spacetime. (Incidentally, Haramein's  
> theory is the closest science has come to verifying the ABC model as  
> well as HPB's metaphysics).
> 
> THerefore, we might think of this cosmic singularity, or primal  
> dimensionless atom of "abstract motion", as the "God particle" that  
> is the "seven robed mother" of the Book of Dzyan -- whose still zero- 
> point center of pure consciousness is the "father"... And, as HPB  
> pointed out, is the primal state of "absolute space" that contains  
> the rootless root of both spirit or consciousness, and matter or mass- 
> energy.  So, where's the need for an external personal God creator  
> when the cosmos is its own creator, sustainer, destroyer or Brahma,  
> Vishnu, Shiva (Kether, Binah, Chochma)?
> 
> Thus, the inherent consciousness at the primal beginning of our  
> present cosmic cycle of manifestation, is the triggering intent of  
> will that wakes up and initiates the emanation and radiation of the  
> manifest cosmos and all its fractal involved energy fields -- which  
> are governed solely by the laws of cycles inherent in original spin  
> momentum, after the release of the reactive nature of karma -- like a  
> compressed coil spring explosively expanding when the latch holding  
> is down is slid open. That's why science calls it the "big  
> bang" (and, now, considers each galaxy as starting with an analogous  
> little big bang.)
> 
> Since the only eternal unchanging reality is that zero-point of pure  
> consciousness -- that's why the ever changing manifest cosmos
> and all the evolving forms in it, are considered as temporary  
> illusions or Maya.
> 
> For a closer view of this concept check out my new blog, "How It All  
> Began" at:
> http://dzyanmaster.wordpress.com/
> and compare it with the theories of Haramein at his web site and in  
> his video lectures at:
> http://www.theresonanceproject.org/
> http://www.youtube.com/watch? 
> v=pPgII_4ciFU&feature=PlayList&p=88EDD1895A2F5587&index=0&playnext=1
> or http://tinyurl.com/haramein
> 
> Leon
> 
>         
> 
> 
> On Sep 7, 2009, at 9/7/098:12 PM, Cass Silva wrote:
> 
> > Leon,
> > This is in response to a poster who struggles with the idea of a  
> > godcreated universe.  Am I on the right track?
> > Cass
> >
> > Can I propose that this  primeval particle was a combination of  
> > matter and energy? As matter is unable to be destroyed only  
> > changed,  could this zero mass reach a point that its constitution  
> > in static equilibrium could no longer be contained and that change  
> > was the inevitable result of an inherent force acting upon itself?
> >
> > This then suggests that matter and energy are in a constant state  
> > of flux (albeit over billions and billions of years) from static to  
> > energetic and that expansion and contraction are  a result or an  
> > effect of changing interacting forces.
> >
> > This then takes god out of the zero point and replaces god with  
> > 'force'.  A force that is subject to its own laws?
> >
> > Cass
> >
> >
> >
> >        
> > ______________________________________________________________________ 
> > ____________
> > Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7 Mail.
> > Learn more: http://au.overview.mail.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>