Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
Jan 21, 2009 10:49 AM
by Martin
Well, do a search on Albert Pike, Zionism, Illuminati etc.
--- On Wed, 1/21/09, Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 1:20 AM
No I didn't know that it was the US and Britain that got Germany into the war - in fact I find that hard to swallow without any evidence - the US bled the brits dry and only came in at the end - what was it Churchill said - America helped win the war even if it was late in coming?
I think the Brits knew something was brewing but didn't act on it until Poland. As far as Israel is concerned there was no need for an Israel until after the holocaust
Cass
--- On Wed, 21/1/09, Martin <Mvandertak@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Martin <Mvandertak@yahoo. com>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Received: Wednesday, 21 January, 2009, 10:27 AM
Cass,
It was the English and Americans with Churchill that got Germany in another war for starters...everythi ng was planned including the making of the state of Israel. The evil involved was and still is for the most part Anglo-American but of course also German, since mighty Germans, financially that is, had their interests as well in the global economy arisen from any war. The spirit of true Germans is unbeaten, their is a lot to learn from that. Did you know btw, the English were the first to wear a swastika in the FIRST worldwar?
--- On Tue, 1/20/09, Cass Silva <silva_cass@ yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Cass Silva <silva_cass@ yahoo. com>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 11:34 PM
Frank, I am not sure what point you are trying to make other than your patriotism towards Germany. Germany was helped considerably by the US and Britain after the war - money was poured in to re-establish the country even though this motive may have been based on future economic gains - US bases in Germany also poured millions into the economy. My mother who was English would remark that the British would have been better off if Germany had won the war. Things were terrible in the UK for up to 25 years after - and I believe it was only in the last 50 years that Britain repaid the loan to the US - where British Rail was mortgage in order to fund the debt. For 5 years after the war the British were still on rashion cards!
No doubt this economic downturn will cause those with cash the ability to buy up cheap properties and thus starting the cycle all over again. Even Germany cannot avoid what is to come in job losses.
This may not be a bad thing for governments or people as we will get the opportunity to reassess the difference between what we need and what we want - what is really important in life.
Cass
____________ _________ _________ __
From: Frank Reitemeyer <dzyan@online. de>
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 20 January, 2009 4:53:48 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
The Illuminati did not want the change upwards, because shareholder value was ended and the bankers could not suck out the people anymore.
The result was that the masses got a yearly increasing wealth, four weeks of holidays, pension, health care, a cheap and indestructible auto - Volkswagen Beetle/Kaefer, idea and design by big H - and KdF holidays in foreign countries - which was at this time, were the French and British worker was still nothing more than a slave with no hope to see once in the lifetime a foreign country, so unbelievable that Disney produced cartoon moives with Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck about it, claiming that this all was merely German propaganda and not real.
Note, that this wonderland of which Roosevelt spoke and of which Obama dreams now already existed in Germany. In the real world. To touch. Without banksters, interests, compound interests (officials was forbidden to have shares from the military-industrial complex), without fear and sorrow, with the daily feeling of justice, truth and prosper. Fear was only on the side of the Jesuits, who would earn money with each dead human being.
The big difference is in the motive and that the one appealed to forces from within and to solve the problems, which others have brought into the country, by themselves, while the other method is piracy, steal the possessions of other nations, to live as a vampyre on the cost of others. USA is a whole continent with raw materials of all kind, from diamonds to oil. Germany is poor land without raw materials and tiny in comparision. How is it possible that the USA cannot live on its own? I guess the FED had to gear down the mind control a little bit, because true force comes only from the higher self. But with this they would risk their discovery - as in Star Trek where Kirk and Spock came to a planet of apparently lucky inhabitants who lived behind invisible walls and were controlled from behind.
Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: Cass Silva
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
Racists and fundamental christians are comparing Obama to Hitler as the next Anti-Christ - We all know that no such entity exists so this article is using the same technique that it argues Obama and Hitler used. Germany needed a change then just as America needs a change now - change can only come about through strong leadership - until Americans start using the 'heil obama' signal I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
It took 8 years for the Americans and the World to wake up to Bush and his ideology of war - what? were we all hypnotised for 8 years?
So No, I don't see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis anymore than I see Martin Luther King that way.
Cass
____________ _________ _________ __
From: christinaleestemake r <christinaleestemak e r@yahoo.com>
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 20 January, 2009 7:53:09 AM
Subject: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.
Obama's speeches are a mass of mind-control techniques and Neuro-
Linguistic-Programm ing, or NLP, and they are carefully constructed to
implant beliefs and perceptions into the mind of the viewer. Click
here for a description of his psycho-babble, headed An Examination of
Obama's Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches.
As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an exercise in mass
mind control and it has been so successful because so many people
live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of which brings
me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and similar
regimes throughout history.
Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the themes
are just the same. Germany was in a terrible state economically and
militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the First World War and
the reparations inflicted on the country by the Rothschild/Illumina ti-
controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in 1919.
>From amid the chaos came the man that Germans saw then in much the
same way that so many see Obama today. His name was Adolf Hitler and
his oratory and rhetoric, again supported by a ritualistic
presentation founded on mind-control techniques, made him appear to
be the German 'messiah', the German Obama.
Hitler promised 'change', 'hope' and something to 'believe in' amidst
the consequences of war and financial collapse. He spoke to vast
rallies of adoring followers and a mass movement emerged in support
of Hitler's vision of a new tomorrow.
As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its true sense
is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. It might end
up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass movement
from within the people who have no understanding of what the
'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered really means.
They just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they make
it mean what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their
horror, what they have signed up for.
Obama's America ...
... Hitler's Germany.
There may seem to be a world of difference, but the techniques are
just the same.
Obama is far more dangerous than Bush because he can sell a line to
those who are in the trance while Boy Bush could not do that on
anything like the same scale. Bush was a transparent idiot with no
communication skills who needed massive fraud at the polls to get him
officially 'elected'. He could never be the figurehead to inspire a
mass movement of the people to support some vacuous 'hope', 'change'
and 'believe' when they don't even know what those words are supposed
to mean.
But Obama clearly can, because he has.
One of 'his' (his controllers' ) prime targets are the young, just as
they were with the Nazis and the Hitler Youth Movement. If you think
this parallel is far-fetched then have a look at this video to see
how extreme Obama worship has already become for some young people.
Hitler Youth was just the same. Click here to watch ...
In line with this theme, the WorldNetDaily website reported:
'The official website of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov,
originally announced that Obama would "require" all middle school
through college students to participate in community service
programs; but after a flurry of blogs protested children being
drafted into Obama's proposed youth corps, the website's wording was
softened.
Originally, under the tab "America Serves", Change.gov read,
"President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like
AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to
help teachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health Corps,
Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps.
"Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by
developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle
school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college
every year," the site announced.'
For the full story, click here ...
Obama said in a speech in July 2008 in Colorado Springs that he
wanted to see a 'civilian national security force' that would be as
powerful and well-funded as the Marines, Navy and Air Force. As
Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily, wrote:
'If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big,
powerful and well funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't
this rather a big deal? I thought Democrats generally believed the
U.S. spent too much on the military.
How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of
massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger
than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Is Obama
serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger
and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he
mean?'
Obama meant, amid the flowery words, that he's not in favour of
either peace or freedom. He is a front-man demagogue for the same
force that controlled Boy Bush, Clinton, Father Bush, Reagan, Carter,
ad infinitum; but the difference is that he has been hyped to such
hysterical proportions that he will be allowed to get away with far
more than they were, at least until reality dawns on the mass ranks
of his hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that could take some time.
The cabal will be anxious to squeeze every minute from Obama's
honeymoon period and we can expect to see events move quickly after
his inauguration in January.
When I was a journalist 30 years ago, I came across a technique that
some tabloid newspaper reporters would use to get someone to speak
with them. They would work in pairs with the first one knocking on
the door of some distressed family who didn't want to talk with the
media. He would tell them he was from a newspaper he didn't really
work for and treat them with aggression and contempt to make them
even more upset.
He would then leave and his colleague would knock on the door, tell
them the real newspaper he was from, and act like Mr. Nice Guy. He
would say that he understood completely how upsetting the other man
must have been, but 'if you will only speak to me exclusively I will
make sure that the other man, nor anyone like him, won't bother you
again'. They usually agreed and the scam was complete.
Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush and Obama. The
Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the Illuminati controlled Bush
for eight years and led the country into foreign wars and financial
chaos (bad guy/problem) ; now the 'Democratic' wing, led by the
infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour', Barack
Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and 'change' (good
guy/solution) .
Hence even some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.
Apart from the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and 'believe', few have
any idea what Obama's policies will be. Public perception comes from
having an 'image' of him, or a self-projection, not the fine print
because Obama doesn't do fine print until the votes are cast and even
then he will hide it in his windbag words.
There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not. He
says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he does
about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops,
including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war?
He has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military
force to stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed
Hillary 'Let's bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral
Commission, Council on Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and
re-appointed Bush's 'Let's bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert
Gates (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations). So that's the
'change we can believe in', then.
Obama isn't against war at all and, if his controllers have their
way, he will engage the US in even more foreign conflicts with the
troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their targets, on a
wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face who would
never go where he's sending them.
He claims to be a 'uniter', which is exactly what Bush said about
himself before he came to office, but unity in and of itself is not
the issue. Nazi Germany had unity in the early years of the war, but
was that a good thing? What matters is what the unity is designed to
achieve and Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire' a mass
movement to support the Orwellian plans of the Illuminati.
His constant rhetoric about 'bringing people together' can be used to
justify the 'coming together' of the United States, Canada and Mexico
in the North American Union; it can be used to concede America's
sovereignty to the 'coming together' of the 'world community' (world
dictatorship) ; it can be used to unite the believers in their
opposition and condemnation of non-believers, which is precisely what
happened in Nazi Germany with the book-burning and violent
suppression of those who challenged the Hitler regime.
The potential of Obama Mania is endless when it comes to selling
fascism as 'hope, change', 'freedom' and a 'New America', or 'New
World' [Order].
Bush and Cheney were transparent warmongers and would always have
struggled to bring in the draft, the compulsory enlistment of people
into the military against their will. But it would not be as
difficult for Obama in the current climate. For goodness sake, he's
already talking about compulsory community service for middle school,
high school and college students and creating a peoples' army in
America.
That's why I say Obama is far more dangerous to freedom than Bush. In
the last eight years Bush could only get part of the way to fascism -
Obama has the potential to finish the job, for all the reasons I have
mentioned and more.
You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has
already appointed to his administration team, to see what his
'change' is truly planned to be. His mentor, svengali and main
controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National Security
Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the
Illuminati's Trilateral Commission.
Brzezinski has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what
he would call today 'terrorists' in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-
controlled government in the capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The
idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan
to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rival superpower 'their
Vietnam'. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives
during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence that
troubles Brzezinski not at all.
Brzezinski's 'freedom fighters' would become known as the
'Mujahideen' and later the Taliban and what is claimed to be 'Al-
Qaeda'. This is the man behind 'anti-war', Barack Obama. It was
common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving
foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of
the Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president.
It is one of many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he is
demanding massive troop reinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan to
fight the Taliban terrorists who were initially armed, trained and
organised by Brzezinski, the man behind Obama. As Morpheus says in
The Matrix: 'Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of irony'.
But then, in Brzezinski's case, it is not 'fate', but cold
calculation that has brought it all about. The Poland-born Brzezinski
has a fierce hatred of Russia and that is still one of his key
targets, together with China.
And if they are Brzezinski's targets, they are Obama's targets.
The Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including
Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation, have now chosen Obama and
the situation will be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots;
Obama's job is simply to sell them to the people. This is rather
alarming when you think that Brzezinski wants to trigger a war
involving Russia and China. 'Obama's' policies come straight from
Brzezinski's books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might recognise
and it was made before Obama ran for president:
'Needed social reassessment ... can be encouraged by deliberate civic
education that stresses the notion of service to a higher cause than
oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a major step in that
direction would be the adoption of an obligatory period of national
service for every young adult, perhaps involving a variety of
congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.'
Now where have I heard that before?
As an Illuminati operative, Brzezinski's aim is to create a world
government, central bank, currency and army - a global dictatorship -
underpinned by a microchipped population connected to a global
computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in 1970, Between Two Ages:
America's Role in the Technetronic Era, in which he described the
global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose:
'The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more
controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite,
unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to
assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain
up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal
information about the citizen. These files will be subject to
instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. '
He also said in the same book nearly 40 years ago:
'Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational
elites ... [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries ... It is
likely that before long the social elites of most of the more
advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in
spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding its
sovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American
sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary
structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to
the present relatively favorable American position.'
And what does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to
bring about 'change'? 'Make sacrifices'. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle,
said:
'We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We need
to be inspired ... to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us
to a different place.'
You can bet that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and
freedom on the road to the global dictatorship described by
Brzezinski for decades.
Brzezinski's son, Mark, was an 'advisor' to the Obama campaign (doing
what his father told him) and, in line with the American one-party-
state, his other son, Ian, was foreign policy advisor to the McCain
campaign (doing what his father told him). His daughter, the Obama-
supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for MSNBC
television.
Obama has been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a
few in the deep inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski
almost certainly goes back to the start of the 1980s when he attended
the Ivy League, and big-time Illuminati, Columbia University where
Brzezinski was head of the Institute for Communist Affairs. Obama
simply will not talk in any detail about this period. He has been
covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral Commission
and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation,
for whom Obama's mother worked.
And a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a 'man of
the people', would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the
slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history?
He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people
that Obama says he wants to 'set free'.
The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who's Who -
Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P.
Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on
his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his
campaign and instead took the no-limit option of 'private' funding.
And those people are going to support a candidate who does not
represent their best interests?? Oh please.
Obama and his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry
his 'campaign team', sold the lie that he had refused to take funding
from 'lobbyists', those who are paid to ensure that politicians frame
legislation, or block it, in the interests of their clients.
But like everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it's a
sleight of hand and mouth. They funnelled vast sums of money into the
Obama accounts through law firms that represent lobbyists and lobby
groups. It provided 'plausible denial' about funding from lobbyists
while the money poured in from lobby interests via third parties.
Then there is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-
billionaire associate of Brzezinski and closely involved with the
funding and marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board member of the
Illuminati's Council on Foreign Relations and funds the European
Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major insider.
You can certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama
'revolution' in the United States. It was the complex and secretive
network of Soros foundations and organisations, connected to the
intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and funded
students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art of mass
protest and overthrowing governments.
These manufactured protests were sold to the world as 'peoples'
revolutions' , but it just so happened that when they were over and
the old regime was removed the new leaders were those waiting in the
wings all along - the puppets of Soros, Brzezinski and their
associated networks.
Obama is just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached,
and controlled completely by the Illuminati networks that chose him,
trained him, sold him and provided his record funding. It was they
who kept his many skeletons under wraps, like the gay sex and crack
cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and they will continue to do
so as long as he jumps to their bidding.
Obama is just another Banksters' moll prostituting himself for fame
and power, and that's why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the
banking system and why he will always put their interests before the
people. His financial advisors are straight from the Wall Street 'A'
list, including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral Commission, Council on
Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal Reserve
from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips.
Obama has made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board,
which is dominated by insiders, including its staff director and
chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the
University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiate of the infamous
Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also
includes Boy and Father Bush. It was Goolsbee who told the Canadian
government not to worry about Obama's attacks on the economic effects
of 'free trade' agreements because his words were just to win votes
in the election campaign.
Another Wall Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg
Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was
appointed by Obama to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the
President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful in
the private 'Federal' Reserve cartel that masquerades as America's
'central bank', and he is a former employee of both the Council on
Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates.
Obama's Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist
Robert Rubin, the Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-
chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and economic advisor to
Obama. Rubin, a member of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the
man behind Citigroup's strategy of expanding its risk in debt markets
which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers' money.
The very people who caused the financial crisis are being appointed
by Obama to decide how to respond to it (more taxpayers' money for
them and their friends).
Rubin was Treasury Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed in that
post by Larry Summers (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission,
Council on Foreign Relations) - another insider appointed to Obama's
team of 'change'. Summers is a fanatical supporter of 'free
trade' (freedom to exploit) and 'globalisation' (global dictatorship)
and he wrote a memo in 1991, while chief economist to the World Bank,
saying that the bank should dump toxic waste in poor countries
because the costs of the ensuing ill-health and death would be lower.
When the memo was made public, Brazil's then-Secretary of the
Environment, Jose Lutzenburger, told Summers:
'Your reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane ... Your
thoughts [provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable alienation,
reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance
of many conventional 'economists' concerning the nature of the world
we live in ... If the World Bank keeps you as vice president it will
lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what I often said ...the
best thing that could happen would be for the Bank to disappear.'
Lutzenburger was dismissed shortly after writing this letter while
the horrific Summers was made US Treasury Secretary by Bill Clinton
and now he has been appointed to head the National Economic Council
by Mr. 'change', hope' and 'believe' Obama. It's all a fairy story.
Bloomberg.com reported that the Center for American Progress (CAP),
housed just three blocks from the White House, has become a major
source for policy initiatives for the Obama Democratic Party. Who
funds the Center for American Progress? George Soros.
It is simply the Neocon Project for the New American Century and the
American Enterprise Institute under another name. Those two
organisations developed and dictated the Bush policy of war and
suppression of freedom and the 'CAP' and others like it will do the
same for Obama. The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it.
In fact, except in name and rhetoric, there is no difference in theme
between the regimes of Bush and Obama. Bush policy was dictated
through Illuminati 'think tanks' and so is Obama's.
Bush was surrounded by slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and so
is Obama. Mr. 'Change' has pledged his unquestioning support for
Israel to the point of 'pass the sick bag' and his vice-president,
Joe Biden (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations), is a
vehement Zionist who makes a virtue of saying he will support Israel
in all circumstances.
Obama has appointed the arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of
staff and another super Zionist Jew, Dennis Ross, to be his Middle
East Policy advisor. God help the Palestinians. Ross also served in
the Bill Clinton and Father George Bush administrations. Oh, plenty
of 'change' there, then.
Rahm Emanuel, a Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of Benjamin M.
Emanuel, who was a member of the murderous Jewish terrorist
organisation, Irgun, which helped to bomb and terrorise Israel into
existence. The Open Secrets website reports that Emanuel was the top
House recipient in 2008 for election contributions from 'hedge funds,
private equity firms and the larger securities/investme nt industry'.
Emanuel was also appointed by Bill Clinton to the board of the
mortgage giant Freddie Mac in 2000 and his tenure coincided with a
stream of scandals and financial irregularities. It famously had to
be bailed out by the taxpayer amid the sub-prime mortgage debacle.
Emanuel, like Obama himself, is an asset of the 'Illinois Combine', a
cross-party network of politicians and business interests that
conspires to manipulate Chicago politics for their own benefit. Even
before taking over at the White House Emanuel faced calls for his
resignation for alleged connections with the Rod Blagojevich scandal.
In December 2008 Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and associate of
Obama, was arrested over a conspiracy involving massive corruption
and moves to sell Obama's Senate seat in Chicago made vacant by his
election to the presidency. It is yet another example of the
staggering web on ongoing and infamous corruption in Chicago by the
very networks that spawned Obama.
A close friend of Rahm Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois
Combine, the Zionist, David Axelrod, who ran Obama's election
campaign and will no doubt be highly influential in the Obama
administration. Axelrod is a veteran of Chicago politics, one of the
most corrupt political systems in the world and he worked for many
Chicago mayors in the 1990s and on Obama's senate campaign in 2004.
Bill Clinton took his Arkansas cabal to Washington when he became
president in 1993 and Obama is uploading his Chicago mob and handing
them key positions of national power and influence. And these guys
don't take prisoners.
All of this may be many things, none of them pleasant, but 'change'
it isn't.
David Axelrod, Obama's 'narrator' and handler. Click here for a
background article that needs some reading between the lines ...
Obama is a monumental fraud who talks a good story, but lives a very
different one. He won his first political office as a state senator
in Chicago in 1996, not through the power of his policies, but by
coldly abusing the electoral process.
Instead of running against his opponents and letting the people
decide, he had his cronies challenge hundreds of names on the
nomination papers of his Democratic primary rivals until they were
all forced off the ballot by technicalities. He then ran unopposed.
One of them, Gha-is Askia, says that Obama's behaviour belied his
image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights:
'Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago
politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honour and
democracy, but what honour is there in getting rid of every other
candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?'
Why? Because he would probably have lost and Obama isn't interested
in losing by playing fair. He wants to win by any means necessary.
The only voter-right he's interested in is the right to vote for him.
He has also used his hatchet-men like Axelrod to employ scandal to
discredit opponents to ensure his election when the real scandal is
the truth about Obama himself.
He is a classically corrupt main-chancer spawned from the Chicago
political cesspit. His close connections, therefore, to seriously
dodgy 'businessmen' and fraudsters like the now-jailed slum landlord
Tony Rezko are exactly what you would expect.
Rezko, yet another snout in the trough of the Illinois Combine, has
heavily funded Obama's political career and that of the now-arrested
Rod Blagojevich, and in return they have supported massive sums being
paid to Rezko by Chicago taxpayers to run 'public housing'.
These properties were then allowed to fall into such a state of
danger and disrepair, including sewage running into kitchen sinks,
that they were deemed unfit for habitation by the often black poor
that Obama was supposed to be representing as a Senator. Some
buildings were so bad they had to be demolished.
Rezko also secured appointments for his business associates to state
boards and was eventually indicted for using these connections to
demand kickbacks from businesses that wanted to do business with the
state.
Rezko and Obama toured the $1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park,
Chicago, which the Obamas bought at $300,000 below the asking price
in 2005 while the Rezkos purchased the adjoining land at the full
asking price. Some of this land was later bought by the Obamas. Rezko
contributed a quarter of a million dollars to Obama's political
career and served on Obama's Senate campaign finance committee, which
raised more than $14 million.
Then there is Obama's close association with the terrorists, William
Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn. In the late sixties Ayers co-
founded the terror organisation called the Weather Underground (also
known as the Weathermen and similar derivatives) and launched a
campaign of bombing public places like the Pentagon and the Capitol
Building. Three members were killed making bombs in Greenwich Village.
In 1970 Ayers was said to have described their philosophy as: 'Kill
all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the
revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at ...'
Mr. Ayers himself comes from the home of 'rich people'.
Bernardine Dohrn said this about the Charles Manson murders: 'Dig it!
Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with
them, then they shoved a fork into a victim's stomach.''
William Ayers in 1968.
On the day of 9/11 he told the New York Times that he didn't regret
the Weather Underground bombing campaign and believed they didn't do
enough.
The case against Ayers and Dohrn was thrown out because of then
illegal wire-taps and Ayers is now a professor in the College of
Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, holding the
titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University
Scholar.
Ayers recruited Obama to serve as chairman on the $100 million
Chicago Annenberg Challenge and they worked together for seven years
handing out grants to the 'educational' projects of people like ...
William Ayers. They also worked together on another tax-exempt
foundation, the Woods Fund in Chicago, which awarded grants to
Obama's own Trinity United Church, home to his controversial pastor,
Jeremiah Wright.
Obama's political career was effectively launched in 1995, just after
he was made chairman of the Annenberg Challenge, at a meeting at the
Chicago home of ... William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They have
been connected to his circle ever since if the truth be told.
The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn't fund
schools directly, but instead insisted that they affiliate with
'external partners' who were granted the money. These turned out to
be far-left 'community organisers' so beloved of Bill Ayers and these
groups included the Association of Community Organizations for Reform
Now (or Acorn).
Obama also conducted 'leadership training' seminars with Acorn and
its members began to become heavily involved in his political
campaigns. It has also been behind efforts to 'register
voters' (voters most likely to vote for Obama) and Nevada state
officials raided Acorn's Las Vegas office after election authorities
accused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with
fake and duplicate names.
Among the major funders of Acorn ... George Soros.
Obama even refuses to prove that he was born in the United States and
thus qualifies to be President. He claims to have been born in
Hawaii, but his grandmother, half-brother and half-sister in Kenya
all insist he was born there.
'Mr. Clean' Obama has a deeply dirty background, but for now no scale
of evidence will stop the swooning Obama zombies from believing the
hype or burst their reality bubble. That is going to take hard
experience and it could take some time and a lot of disappointment
before they are released from the clutches of cognitive dissonance
and have to admit to themselves they have been had.
It is the same for all the black people who voted for what they
thought was the first black president when, in truth, he is a man in
a black mask representing the interests of the white-faced Illuminati
cabal, the very families and networks that ran the slave trade.
I don't want to be the bringer of bad news or the thwarter of dreams,
but honesty demands it. The man is a trickster controlled by
supertricksters. A sock puppet controlled by bigger sock puppets who
serve an even greater and darker evil. To his masters, Obama is just
a means to an end and if it suits them to assassinate him to trigger
civil war and upheaval in the United States then that is what they
will do.
Oh dear Oprah, how will you cope when reality dawns? But, then, will
it ever??
'What? You mean you're not the Lord?'
I can understand the appeal of Obama because people want him to be
what he claims to be, but isn't. They are sick of the conflict, the
corruption, the struggle we call 'life' and they want it all to
change. But Obama's change is illusory and represents only the
continued transformation of society in the image envisaged by Orwell.
We will see some apparently good things announced, like the closing
of Guantanamo, to give the impression that Obama means what he says.
But keep your eye on the ball and you'll see how the agenda of the
global tyranny is introduced under the guise of Obama's 'hope',
'change', 'believe', 'sacrifice' and 'coming together'.
It could take two years, maybe much more, before cognitive dissonance
(lying to yourself) loses it current grip on the minds of the Obama
faithful. Until then they will make endless excuses for him (lie to
themselves) to keep the 'dream' alive.
But one day they will have to admit, by the power of the evidence
before them, that they bought a dream and got a nightmare. What a
pity they can't see the obvious now and save them themselves such
painful disappointment.
Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
