Theos-Talk Archives (January 2009 Message tt00488)

the use of NLP have all to do with it too.
Christina





--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "adelasie" <adelasie@...> wrote:
>
> Christina,
> 
> What does all this have to do with theosophy? 
> 
> Adelasie
> 
> On 19 Jan 2009 at 20:53, christinaleestemaker wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Obama's speeches are a mass of mind-control techniques and Neuro-
> > Linguistic-Programming, or NLP, and they are carefully 
constructed to
> > implant beliefs and perceptions into the mind of the viewer. Click
> > here for a description of his psycho-babble, headed An 
Examination of
> > Obama's Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches.
> > 
> > As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an exercise in 
mass
> > mind control and it has been so successful because so many people
> > live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of which 
brings
> > me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and similar
> > regimes throughout history.
> > 
> > Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the 
themes
> > are just the same. Germany was in a terrible state economically 
and
> > militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the First World War 
and
> > the reparations inflicted on the country by the Rothschild/
Illuminati-
> > controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in 1919.
> > 
> > From amid the chaos came the man that Germans saw then in much the
> > same way that so many see Obama today. His name was Adolf Hitler 
and
> > his oratory and rhetoric, again supported by a ritualistic
> > presentation founded on mind-control techniques, made him appear 
to
> > be the German 'messiah', the German Obama.
> > 
> > Hitler promised 'change', 'hope' and something to 'believe in' 
amidst
> > the consequences of war and financial collapse. He spoke to vast
> > rallies of adoring followers and a mass movement emerged in 
support
> > of Hitler's vision of a new tomorrow.
> > 
> > As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its true 
sense
> > is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. It might 
end
> > up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass movement
> > from within the people who have no understanding of what the
> > 'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered really means.
> > They just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they 
make
> > it mean what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to 
their
> > horror, what they have signed up for.
> > 
> > Obama's America ...
> > 
> > ... Hitler's Germany.
> > 
> > There may seem to be a world of difference, but the techniques are
> > just the same.
> > 
> > Obama is far more dangerous than Bush because he can sell a line 
to
> > those who are in the trance while Boy Bush could not do that on
> > anything like the same scale. Bush was a transparent idiot with no
> > communication skills who needed massive fraud at the polls to get 
him
> > officially 'elected'. He could never be the figurehead to inspire 
a
> > mass movement of the people to support some vacuous 'hope', 
'change'
> > and 'believe' when they don't even know what those words are 
supposed
> > to mean.
> > 
> > But Obama clearly can, because he has.
> > 
> > One of 'his' (his controllers') prime targets are the young, just 
as
> > they were with the Nazis and the Hitler Youth Movement. If you 
think
> > this parallel is far-fetched then have a look at this video to see
> > how extreme Obama worship has already become for some young 
people.
> > Hitler Youth was just the same. Click here to watch ...
> > 
> > In line with this theme, the WorldNetDaily website reported:
> > 
> > 'The official website of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov,
> > originally announced that Obama would "require" all middle school
> > through college students to participate in community service
> > programs; but after a flurry of blogs protested children being
> > drafted into Obama's proposed youth corps, the website's wording 
was
> > softened.
> > 
> > Originally, under the tab "America Serves", Change.gov read,
> > "President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like
> > AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps 
to
> > help teachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health 
Corps,
> > Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps.
> > 
> > "Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by
> > developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in 
middle
> > school and high school and 100 hours of community service in 
college
> > every year," the site announced.'
> > 
> > For the full story, click here ...
> > 
> > Obama said in a speech in July 2008 in Colorado Springs that he
> > wanted to see a 'civilian national security force' that would be 
as
> > powerful and well-funded as the Marines, Navy and Air Force. As
> > Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily, wrote:
> > 
> > 'If we're going to create some kind of national police force as 
big,
> > powerful and well funded as our combined U.S. military forces, 
isn't
> > this rather a big deal? I thought Democrats generally believed the
> > U.S. spent too much on the military.
> > 
> > How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind 
of
> > massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger
> > than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Is Obama
> > serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger
> > and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did 
he
> > mean?'
> > 
> > Obama meant, amid the flowery words, that he's not in favour of
> > either peace or freedom. He is a front-man demagogue for the same
> > force that controlled Boy Bush, Clinton, Father Bush, Reagan, 
Carter,
> > ad infinitum; but the difference is that he has been hyped to such
> > hysterical proportions that he will be allowed to get away with 
far
> > more than they were, at least until reality dawns on the mass 
ranks
> > of his hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that could take some 
time.
> > 
> > The cabal will be anxious to squeeze every minute from Obama's
> > honeymoon period and we can expect to see events move quickly 
after
> > his inauguration in January.
> > 
> > When I was a journalist 30 years ago, I came across a technique 
that
> > some tabloid newspaper reporters would use to get someone to speak
> > with them. They would work in pairs with the first one knocking on
> > the door of some distressed family who didn't want to talk with 
the
> > media. He would tell them he was from a newspaper he didn't really
> > work for and treat them with aggression and contempt to make them
> > even more upset.
> > 
> > He would then leave and his colleague would knock on the door, 
tell
> > them the real newspaper he was from, and act like Mr. Nice Guy. He
> > would say that he understood completely how upsetting the other 
man
> > must have been, but 'if you will only speak to me exclusively I 
will
> > make sure that the other man, nor anyone like him, won't bother 
you
> > again'. They usually agreed and the scam was complete.
> > 
> > Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush and Obama. 
The
> > Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the Illuminati controlled 
Bush
> > for eight years and led the country into foreign wars and 
financial
> > chaos (bad guy/problem); now the 'Democratic' wing, led by the
> > infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour', 
Barack
> > Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and 'change' (good
> > guy/solution).
> > 
> > Hence even some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.
> > 
> > Apart from the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and 'believe', few have
> > any idea what Obama's policies will be. Public perception comes 
from
> > having an 'image' of him, or a self-projection, not the fine print
> > because Obama doesn't do fine print until the votes are cast and 
even
> > then he will hide it in his windbag words.
> > 
> > There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not. He
> > says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he 
does
> > about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops,
> > including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against 
war?
> > He has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military
> > force to stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed
> > Hillary 'Let's bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral
> > Commission, Council on Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State 
and
> > re-appointed Bush's 'Let's bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert
> > Gates (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations). So that's 
the
> > 'change we can believe in', then.
> > 
> > Obama isn't against war at all and, if his controllers have their
> > way, he will engage the US in even more foreign conflicts with the
> > troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their targets, on a
> > wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face who would
> > never go where he's sending them.
> > 
> > He claims to be a 'uniter', which is exactly what Bush said about
> > himself before he came to office, but unity in and of itself is 
not
> > the issue. Nazi Germany had unity in the early years of the war, 
but
> > was that a good thing? What matters is what the unity is designed 
to
> > achieve and Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire' a mass
> > movement to support the Orwellian plans of the Illuminati.
> > 
> > His constant rhetoric about 'bringing people together' can be 
used to
> > justify the 'coming together' of the United States, Canada and 
Mexico
> > in the North American Union; it can be used to concede America's
> > sovereignty to the 'coming together' of the 'world 
community' (world
> > dictatorship); it can be used to unite the believers in their
> > opposition and condemnation of non-believers, which is precisely 
what
> > happened in Nazi Germany with the book-burning and violent
> > suppression of those who challenged the Hitler regime.
> > 
> > The potential of Obama Mania is endless when it comes to selling
> > fascism as 'hope, change', 'freedom' and a 'New America', or 'New
> > World' [Order].
> > 
> > Bush and Cheney were transparent warmongers and would always have
> > struggled to bring in the draft, the compulsory enlistment of 
people
> > into the military against their will. But it would not be as
> > difficult for Obama in the current climate. For goodness sake, 
he's
> > already talking about compulsory community service for middle 
school,
> > high school and college students and creating a peoples' army in
> > America.
> > 
> > That's why I say Obama is far more dangerous to freedom than 
Bush. In
> > the last eight years Bush could only get part of the way to 
fascism -
> > Obama has the potential to finish the job, for all the reasons I 
have
> > mentioned and more.
> > 
> > You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has
> > already appointed to his administration team, to see what his
> > 'change' is truly planned to be. His mentor, svengali and main
> > controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National 
Security
> > Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the
> > Illuminati's Trilateral Commission.
> > 
> > Brzezinski has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train 
what
> > he would call today 'terrorists' in Afghanistan to oppose the 
Soviet-
> > controlled government in the capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. 
The
> > idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade 
Afghanistan
> > to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rival superpower 
'their
> > Vietnam'. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives
> > during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence that
> > troubles Brzezinski not at all.
> > 
> > Brzezinski's 'freedom fighters' would become known as the
> > 'Mujahideen' and later the Taliban and what is claimed to be 'Al-
> > Qaeda'. This is the man behind 'anti-war', Barack Obama. It was
> > common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving
> > foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of
> > the Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president.
> > 
> > It is one of many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he is
> > demanding massive troop reinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan 
to
> > fight the Taliban terrorists who were initially armed, trained and
> > organised by Brzezinski, the man behind Obama. As Morpheus says in
> > The Matrix: 'Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of irony'.
> > 
> > But then, in Brzezinski's case, it is not 'fate', but cold
> > calculation that has brought it all about. The Poland-born 
Brzezinski
> > has a fierce hatred of Russia and that is still one of his key
> > targets, together with China.
> > 
> > And if they are Brzezinski's targets, they are Obama's targets.
> > 
> > The Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, 
including
> > Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation, have now chosen Obama 
and
> > the situation will be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots;
> > Obama's job is simply to sell them to the people. This is rather
> > alarming when you think that Brzezinski wants to trigger a war
> > involving Russia and China. 'Obama's' policies come straight from
> > Brzezinski's books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might 
recognise
> > and it was made before Obama ran for president:
> > 
> > 'Needed social reassessment ... can be encouraged by deliberate 
civic
> > education that stresses the notion of service to a higher cause 
than
> > oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a major step in that
> > direction would be the adoption of an obligatory period of 
national
> > service for every young adult, perhaps involving a variety of
> > congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.'
> > 
> > Now where have I heard that before?
> > 
> > As an Illuminati operative, Brzezinski's aim is to create a world
> > government, central bank, currency and army - a global 
dictatorship -
> > underpinned by a microchipped population connected to a global
> > computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in 1970, Between Two 
Ages:
> > America's Role in the Technetronic Era, in which he described the
> > global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose:
> > 
> > 'The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more
> > controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite,
> > unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to
> > assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and 
maintain
> > up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal
> > information about the citizen. These files will be subject to
> > instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.'
> > 
> > He also said in the same book nearly 40 years ago:
> > 
> > 'Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational
> > elites ... [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries ... It is
> > likely that before long the social elites of most of the more
> > advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in
> > spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding its
> > sovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American
> > sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary
> > structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to
> > the present relatively favorable American position.'
> > 
> > And what does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to 
do to
> > bring about 'change'? 'Make sacrifices'. As Mrs. Demagogue, 
Michelle,
> > said:
> > 
> > 'We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We 
need
> > to be inspired ... to make the sacrifices that are needed to push 
us
> > to a different place.'
> > 
> > You can bet that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty 
and
> > freedom on the road to the global dictatorship described by
> > Brzezinski for decades.
> > 
> > Brzezinski's son, Mark, was an 'advisor' to the Obama campaign 
(doing
> > what his father told him) and, in line with the American one-
party-
> > state, his other son, Ian, was foreign policy advisor to the 
McCain
> > campaign (doing what his father told him). His daughter, the 
Obama-
> > supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for MSNBC
> > television.
> > 
> > Obama has been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only 
to a
> > few in the deep inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski
> > almost certainly goes back to the start of the 1980s when he 
attended
> > the Ivy League, and big-time Illuminati, Columbia University where
> > Brzezinski was head of the Institute for Communist Affairs. Obama
> > simply will not talk in any detail about this period. He has been
> > covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral 
Commission
> > and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford 
Foundation,
> > for whom Obama's mother worked.
> > 
> > And a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a 'man of
> > the people', would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run 
the
> > slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American 
history?
> > He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very 
people
> > that Obama says he wants to 'set free'.
> > 
> > The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who's Who -
> > Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P.
> > Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on
> > his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his
> > campaign and instead took the no-limit option of 'private' 
funding.
> > 
> > And those people are going to support a candidate who does not
> > represent their best interests?? Oh please.
> > 
> > Obama and his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry
> > his 'campaign team', sold the lie that he had refused to take 
funding
> > from 'lobbyists', those who are paid to ensure that politicians 
frame
> > legislation, or block it, in the interests of their clients.
> > 
> > But like everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it's a
> > sleight of hand and mouth. They funnelled vast sums of money into 
the
> > Obama accounts through law firms that represent lobbyists and 
lobby
> > groups. It provided 'plausible denial' about funding from 
lobbyists
> > while the money poured in from lobby interests via third parties.
> > 
> > Then there is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-
> > billionaire associate of Brzezinski and closely involved with the
> > funding and marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board member of 
the
> > Illuminati's Council on Foreign Relations and funds the European
> > Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major insider.
> > 
> > You can certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama
> > 'revolution' in the United States. It was the complex and 
secretive
> > network of Soros foundations and organisations, connected to the
> > intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and 
funded
> > students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art of mass
> > protest and overthrowing governments.
> > 
> > These manufactured protests were sold to the world as 'peoples'
> > revolutions', but it just so happened that when they were over and
> > the old regime was removed the new leaders were those waiting in 
the
> > wings all along - the puppets of Soros, Brzezinski and their
> > associated networks.
> > 
> > Obama is just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached,
> > and controlled completely by the Illuminati networks that chose 
him,
> > trained him, sold him and provided his record funding. It was they
> > who kept his many skeletons under wraps, like the gay sex and 
crack
> > cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and they will continue to 
do
> > so as long as he jumps to their bidding.
> > 
> > Obama is just another Banksters' moll prostituting himself for 
fame
> > and power, and that's why he supported the grotesque bail-out of 
the
> > banking system and why he will always put their interests before 
the
> > people. His financial advisors are straight from the Wall Street 
'A'
> > list, including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral Commission, 
Council on
> > Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal 
Reserve
> > from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips.
> > 
> > Obama has made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board,
> > which is dominated by insiders, including its staff director and
> > chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the
> > University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiate of the infamous
> > Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also
> > includes Boy and Father Bush. It was Goolsbee who told the 
Canadian
> > government not to worry about Obama's attacks on the economic 
effects
> > of 'free trade' agreements because his words were just to win 
votes
> > in the election campaign.
> > 
> > Another Wall Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner 
(Bilderberg
> > Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was
> > appointed by Obama to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the
> > President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful 
in
> > the private 'Federal' Reserve cartel that masquerades as America's
> > 'central bank', and he is a former employee of both the Council on
> > Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates.
> > 
> > Obama's Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the 
Zionist
> > Robert Rubin, the Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-
> > chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and economic 
advisor to
> > Obama. Rubin, a member of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the
> > man behind Citigroup's strategy of expanding its risk in debt 
markets
> > which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers' money.
> > 
> > The very people who caused the financial crisis are being 
appointed
> > by Obama to decide how to respond to it (more taxpayers' money for
> > them and their friends).
> > 
> > Rubin was Treasury Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed in 
that
> > post by Larry Summers (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission,
> > Council on Foreign Relations) - another insider appointed to 
Obama's
> > team of 'change'. Summers is a fanatical supporter of 'free
> > trade' (freedom to exploit) and 'globalisation' (global 
dictatorship)
> > and he wrote a memo in 1991, while chief economist to the World 
Bank,
> > saying that the bank should dump toxic waste in poor countries
> > because the costs of the ensuing ill-health and death would be 
lower.
> > When the memo was made public, Brazil's then-Secretary of the
> > Environment, Jose Lutzenburger, told Summers:
> > 
> > 'Your reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane ... Your
> > thoughts [provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable 
alienation,
> > reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness and the arrogant 
ignorance
> > of many conventional 'economists' concerning the nature of the 
world
> > we live in ... If the World Bank keeps you as vice president it 
will
> > lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what I often 
said ...the
> > best thing that could happen would be for the Bank to disappear.'
> > 
> > Lutzenburger was dismissed shortly after writing this letter while
> > the horrific Summers was made US Treasury Secretary by Bill 
Clinton
> > and now he has been appointed to head the National Economic 
Council
> > by Mr. 'change', hope' and 'believe' Obama. It's all a fairy 
story.
> > 
> > Bloomberg.com reported that the Center for American Progress 
(CAP),
> > housed just three blocks from the White House, has become a major
> > source for policy initiatives for the Obama Democratic Party. Who
> > funds the Center for American Progress? George Soros.
> > 
> > It is simply the Neocon Project for the New American Century and 
the
> > American Enterprise Institute under another name. Those two
> > organisations developed and dictated the Bush policy of war and
> > suppression of freedom and the 'CAP' and others like it will do 
the
> > same for Obama. The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it.
> > 
> > In fact, except in name and rhetoric, there is no difference in 
theme
> > between the regimes of Bush and Obama. Bush policy was dictated
> > through Illuminati 'think tanks' and so is Obama's.
> > 
> > Bush was surrounded by slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and 
so
> > is Obama. Mr. 'Change' has pledged his unquestioning support for
> > Israel to the point of 'pass the sick bag' and his vice-president,
> > Joe Biden (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations), is a
> > vehement Zionist who makes a virtue of saying he will support 
Israel
> > in all circumstances.
> > 
> > Obama has appointed the arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of
> > staff and another super Zionist Jew, Dennis Ross, to be his Middle
> > East Policy advisor. God help the Palestinians. Ross also served 
in
> > the Bill Clinton and Father George Bush administrations. Oh, 
plenty
> > of 'change' there, then.
> > 
> > Rahm Emanuel, a Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of Benjamin 
M.
> > Emanuel, who was a member of the murderous Jewish terrorist
> > organisation, Irgun, which helped to bomb and terrorise Israel 
into
> > existence. The Open Secrets website reports that Emanuel was the 
top
> > House recipient in 2008 for election contributions from 'hedge 
funds,
> > private equity firms and the larger securities/investment 
industry'.
> > 
> > Emanuel was also appointed by Bill Clinton to the board of the
> > mortgage giant Freddie Mac in 2000 and his tenure coincided with a
> > stream of scandals and financial irregularities. It famously had 
to
> > be bailed out by the taxpayer amid the sub-prime mortgage debacle.
> > 
> > Emanuel, like Obama himself, is an asset of the 'Illinois 
Combine', a
> > cross-party network of politicians and business interests that
> > conspires to manipulate Chicago politics for their own benefit. 
Even
> > before taking over at the White House Emanuel faced calls for his
> > resignation for alleged connections with the Rod Blagojevich 
scandal.
> > 
> > In December 2008 Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and associate 
of
> > Obama, was arrested over a conspiracy involving massive corruption
> > and moves to sell Obama's Senate seat in Chicago made vacant by 
his
> > election to the presidency. It is yet another example of the
> > staggering web on ongoing and infamous corruption in Chicago by 
the
> > very networks that spawned Obama.
> > 
> > A close friend of Rahm Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois
> > Combine, the Zionist, David Axelrod, who ran Obama's election
> > campaign and will no doubt be highly influential in the Obama
> > administration. Axelrod is a veteran of Chicago politics, one of 
the
> > most corrupt political systems in the world and he worked for many
> > Chicago mayors in the 1990s and on Obama's senate campaign in 
2004.
> > 
> > Bill Clinton took his Arkansas cabal to Washington when he became
> > president in 1993 and Obama is uploading his Chicago mob and 
handing
> > them key positions of national power and influence. And these guys
> > don't take prisoners.
> > 
> > All of this may be many things, none of them pleasant, but 
'change'
> > it isn't.
> > 
> > David Axelrod, Obama's 'narrator' and handler. Click here for a
> > background article that needs some reading between the lines ...
> > 
> > Obama is a monumental fraud who talks a good story, but lives a 
very
> > different one. He won his first political office as a state 
senator
> > in Chicago in 1996, not through the power of his policies, but by
> > coldly abusing the electoral process.
> > 
> > Instead of running against his opponents and letting the people
> > decide, he had his cronies challenge hundreds of names on the
> > nomination papers of his Democratic primary rivals until they were
> > all forced off the ballot by technicalities. He then ran 
unopposed.
> > One of them, Gha-is Askia, says that Obama's behaviour belied his
> > image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter 
rights:
> > 
> > 'Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago
> > politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honour 
and
> > democracy, but what honour is there in getting rid of every other
> > candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people 
decide?'
> > 
> > Why? Because he would probably have lost and Obama isn't 
interested
> > in losing by playing fair. He wants to win by any means necessary.
> > The only voter-right he's interested in is the right to vote for 
him.
> > He has also used his hatchet-men like Axelrod to employ scandal to
> > discredit opponents to ensure his election when the real scandal 
is
> > the truth about Obama himself.
> > 
> > He is a classically corrupt main-chancer spawned from the Chicago
> > political cesspit. His close connections, therefore, to seriously
> > dodgy 'businessmen' and fraudsters like the now-jailed slum 
landlord
> > Tony Rezko are exactly what you would expect.
> > 
> > Rezko, yet another snout in the trough of the Illinois Combine, 
has
> > heavily funded Obama's political career and that of the now-
arrested
> > Rod Blagojevich, and in return they have supported massive sums 
being
> > paid to Rezko by Chicago taxpayers to run 'public housing'.
> > 
> > These properties were then allowed to fall into such a state of
> > danger and disrepair, including sewage running into kitchen sinks,
> > that they were deemed unfit for habitation by the often black poor
> > that Obama was supposed to be representing as a Senator. Some
> > buildings were so bad they had to be demolished.
> > 
> > Rezko also secured appointments for his business associates to 
state
> > boards and was eventually indicted for using these connections to
> > demand kickbacks from businesses that wanted to do business with 
the
> > state.
> > 
> > Rezko and Obama toured the $1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park,
> > Chicago, which the Obamas bought at $300,000 below the asking 
price
> > in 2005 while the Rezkos purchased the adjoining land at the full
> > asking price. Some of this land was later bought by the Obamas. 
Rezko
> > contributed a quarter of a million dollars to Obama's political
> > career and served on Obama's Senate campaign finance committee, 
which
> > raised more than $14 million.
> > 
> > Then there is Obama's close association with the terrorists, 
William
> > Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn. In the late sixties Ayers co-
> > founded the terror organisation called the Weather Underground 
(also
> > known as the Weathermen and similar derivatives) and launched a
> > campaign of bombing public places like the Pentagon and the 
Capitol
> > Building. Three members were killed making bombs in Greenwich 
Village.
> > 
> > In 1970 Ayers was said to have described their philosophy as: 
'Kill
> > all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the
> > revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really 
at ...'
> > Mr. Ayers himself comes from the home of 'rich people'.
> > 
> > Bernardine Dohrn said this about the Charles Manson murders: 'Dig 
it!
> > Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room 
with
> > them, then they shoved a fork into a victim's stomach.''
> > 
> > William Ayers in 1968.
> > 
> > On the day of 9/11 he told the New York Times that he didn't 
regret
> > the Weather Underground bombing campaign and believed they didn't 
do
> > enough.
> > 
> > The case against Ayers and Dohrn was thrown out because of then
> > illegal wire-taps and Ayers is now a professor in the College of
> > Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, holding the
> > titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior 
University
> > Scholar.
> > 
> > Ayers recruited Obama to serve as chairman on the $100 million
> > Chicago Annenberg Challenge and they worked together for seven 
years
> > handing out grants to the 'educational' projects of people 
like ...
> > William Ayers. They also worked together on another tax-exempt
> > foundation, the Woods Fund in Chicago, which awarded grants to
> > Obama's own Trinity United Church, home to his controversial 
pastor,
> > Jeremiah Wright.
> > 
> > Obama's political career was effectively launched in 1995, just 
after
> > he was made chairman of the Annenberg Challenge, at a meeting at 
the
> > Chicago home of ... William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They have
> > been connected to his circle ever since if the truth be told.
> > 
> > The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn't 
fund
> > schools directly, but instead insisted that they affiliate with
> > 'external partners' who were granted the money. These turned out 
to
> > be far-left 'community organisers' so beloved of Bill Ayers and 
these
> > groups included the Association of Community Organizations for 
Reform
> > Now (or Acorn).
> > 
> > Obama also conducted 'leadership training' seminars with Acorn and
> > its members began to become heavily involved in his political
> > campaigns. It has also been behind efforts to 'register
> > voters' (voters most likely to vote for Obama) and Nevada state
> > officials raided Acorn's Las Vegas office after election 
authorities
> > accused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with
> > fake and duplicate names.
> > 
> > Among the major funders of Acorn ... George Soros.
> > 
> > Obama even refuses to prove that he was born in the United States 
and
> > thus qualifies to be President. He claims to have been born in
> > Hawaii, but his grandmother, half-brother and half-sister in Kenya
> > all insist he was born there.
> > 
> > 'Mr. Clean' Obama has a deeply dirty background, but for now no 
scale
> > of evidence will stop the swooning Obama zombies from believing 
the
> > hype or burst their reality bubble. That is going to take hard
> > experience and it could take some time and a lot of disappointment
> > before they are released from the clutches of cognitive dissonance
> > and have to admit to themselves they have been had.
> > 
> > It is the same for all the black people who voted for what they
> > thought was the first black president when, in truth, he is a man 
in
> > a black mask representing the interests of the white-faced 
Illuminati
> > cabal, the very families and networks that ran the slave trade.
> > 
> > I don't want to be the bringer of bad news or the thwarter of 
dreams,
> > but honesty demands it. The man is a trickster controlled by
> > supertricksters. A sock puppet controlled by bigger sock puppets 
who
> > serve an even greater and darker evil. To his masters, Obama is 
just
> > a means to an end and if it suits them to assassinate him to 
trigger
> > civil war and upheaval in the United States then that is what they
> > will do.
> > 
> > Oh dear Oprah, how will you cope when reality dawns? But, then, 
will
> > it ever??
> > 
> > 'What? You mean you're not the Lord?'
> > 
> > I can understand the appeal of Obama because people want him to be
> > what he claims to be, but isn't. They are sick of the conflict, 
the
> > corruption, the struggle we call 'life' and they want it all to
> > change. But Obama's change is illusory and represents only the
> > continued transformation of society in the image envisaged by 
Orwell.
> > 
> > We will see some apparently good things announced, like the 
closing
> > of Guantanamo, to give the impression that Obama means what he 
says.
> > But keep your eye on the ball and you'll see how the agenda of the
> > global tyranny is introduced under the guise of Obama's 'hope',
> > 'change', 'believe', 'sacrifice' and 'coming together'.
> > 
> > It could take two years, maybe much more, before cognitive 
dissonance
> > (lying to yourself) loses it current grip on the minds of the 
Obama
> > faithful. Until then they will make endless excuses for him (lie 
to
> > themselves) to keep the 'dream' alive.
> > 
> > But one day they will have to admit, by the power of the evidence
> > before them, that they bought a dream and got a nightmare. What a
> > pity they can't see the obvious now and save them themselves such
> > painful disappointment.
> > 
> 
>                                                                     
> >
>