Theos-Talk Archives (January 2009 Message tt00174)

Raquel,
   People who know me personally wince when I adlib in humour lol!

Regards,
John

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Raquel Rodríguez <raquel_rpj@yahoo.es> 
John

Is it my imagination, did I not noticed before?, but I find you endowed with a new sense of humor this new year.

Warm Regards

Raquel

--- El jue, 8/1/09, Augoeides-222@comcast.net <Augoeides-222@comcast.net> escribió:

De: Augoeides-222@comcast.net <Augoeides-222@comcast.net>
Asunto: Re: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?
Para: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: jueves, 8 enero, 2009 6:02

Raquel,
On the lighter side when i read "Phaedofilia" I ran to get
Plato's "Phaedrus" to figure out why CWL loved it (Philia" )
lol!
Tongue in cheek!

Regards,
John

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Raquel Rodríguez <raquel_rpj@yahoo.es> 

Cass, Chistina

Yes, provably I took it wrong. I have to say I did not read the whole of the
discussion, I agree the word is been said far too much and this discussion is
getting nowhere. I think all Theosophist are acquainted with the
Leadbeater-Beasant controversy and everyone has their own right to choose
whether they want to study without being insulted for that.
Discussion about controversies and different teachings have been very important
to me in the past of this forum, as I have been able to gather as many different
point of views as possible and arrive at my own conclusions. After certain point
and over certain tone the discussion becomes nonsense and even annoying.

Warm Regards

Raquel

--- El jue, 8/1/09, Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo.com> escribió:

De: Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo.com>
Asunto: Re: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?
Para: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: jueves, 8 enero, 2009 3:14

My reading was that Zaitev was making the point that anyone can be called a
paedofile but that doesn't prove the accusation - it was a defence of
Leadbeater - innocent until proven guilty

One would imagine though that leadbeater would have expressed the same sort of
anger that Morten did - but then we cannot ask people to behave the way we
expect them too. Anyway I close with the 'not the paedofilia thing
again'

Cass

____________ _________ _________ __
From: Raquel Rodríguez <raquel_rpj@yahoo. es>
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Thursday, 8 January, 2009 8:44:38 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?

Zaiztev

I think, it would be more correct if you use the pronoun I instead we. Myself
personally, would not find any reason at all to apply such an adjective on
Morten. I also can not imagine what drives you to make such an insulting
assertion, but sounds totally unnecessary.
Maybe is not we that insult Morten, but You, who insults everyone.

Raquel

--- El mié, 7/1/09, Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yahoo. com> escribió:

De: Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yahoo. com>
Asunto: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?
Para: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Fecha: miércoles, 7 enero, 2009 6:56

--- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen"
<global-theosophy@ ...> wrote:

> C. W. Leadbeater was given the name phaedophile in may 1906.

We can give this name to you too.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look
http://au.docs. yahoo.com/ mail/smarterinbo x

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]