Theos-Talk Archives (January 2009 Message tt00135)

My reading was that Zaitev was making the point that anyone can be called a paedofile but that doesn't prove the accusation - it was a defence of Leadbeater - innocent until proven guilty

One would imagine though that leadbeater would have expressed the same sort of anger that Morten did - but then we cannot ask people to behave the way we expect them too. Anyway I close with the 'not the paedofilia thing again'

Cass

Â



________________________________
From: Raquel RodrÃguez <raquel_rpj@yahoo.es>
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 8 January, 2009 8:44:38 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?


Zaiztev
Â
I think, itÂwould be more correct if you use the pronoun I instead we.ÂMyself personally, would not find any reason at all to apply such an adjective on Morten. I also can not imagine what drives you to make such an insulting assertion, but sounds totally unnecessary.
Maybe is not we that insult Morten, but You, who insults everyone.
Â
Raquel

--- El miÃ, 7/1/09, Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yahoo. com> escribiÃ:

De: Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yahoo. com>
Asunto: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?
Para: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Fecha: miÃrcoles, 7 enero, 2009 6:56

--- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen"
<global-theosophy@ ...> wrote:

> C. W. Leadbeater was given the name phaedophile in may 1906.

We can give this name to you too.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 


      Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]