Theos-Talk Archives (December 2008 Message tt00421)

There were not Blavatsky mistakes, only the later leaders thought 
so!!!!As you can read by yourself in the summary of tibetan work.
They only could notice that her work was not in sequential form.
http://nimrodgroup.org/AAB/Summary%20of%20Tibetan%27s%20Work.pdf



***Initiation, Human and Solar was intended to bring the fact of the 
Hierarchy to public attention. This had been done by H. P. B. by 
inference and statement but not in any sequential form. The 
Theosophical Society had taught the fact of the [778] Masters, though 
H. P. Blavatsky (in a communication to the Esoteric Section) stated 
that she bitterly regretted so doing. This teaching was 
misinterpreted by later theosophical leaders and they made certain 
basic mistakes. The Masters whom they portrayed were characterized by 
an impossible infallibility, because the Masters are themselves 
evolving; the teaching given endorsed an engrossing interest in self-
development and an intense focusing upon personal unfoldment and 
liberation; the people who were indicated as initiates and senior 
disciples were entirely mediocre with no influence outside the 
Theosophical Society itself; complete devotion to the Masters was 
also emphasized - devotion to their personalities




--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
theosophy@...> wrote:
>
> My views are:
> 
> Yes. Well Alice A. Bailey claimed that she meet him on the inner 
level that is.
> 
> Yes. I find Alice A. Baileys Autobiography to very superficial and 
non-careful when dealing with Blavatsky's mistakes.
> 
> 
> 
> M. Sufilight
>