Theos-Talk Archives (December 2008 Message tt00285)

Is there anyone who can help me out, and who understands Christina words in this thread?


M. Sufillight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: christinaleestemaker 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:55 PM
  Subject: Re: Theos-World 2012 ?


  If you and you think for others, don't understand me; While you don't 
  understand what masters say on it.That are not my words, I only 
  citate them.
  Christina

  -- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
  theosophy@...> wrote:
  >
  > My views are:
  > 
  > Yes?
  > And then what?
  > 
  > ---
  > I am not sure I and others understand you.
  > 
  > 
  > M. Sufilight
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: christinaleestemaker 
  > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:53 PM
  > Subject: Re: Theos-World 2012 ?
  > 
  > 
  > Ok as I read in Mahatma Letters, Jesus as mortal like anyone of 
  us, 
  > an adept more by his inherent purity and ignorance of real evil, 
  > than by what he have learned with his initiated rabbis and the 
  > already (at that period) fast degenerating Eyptian Hierophants 
  and 
  > priests. etc 
  > Letter 59 page 339 Barkers edition 1979
  > 
  > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
  > theosophy@> wrote:
  > >
  > > My views are:
  > > 
  > > The "darkness" mentioned by Blavatsky is about when Jesus 
  (Joshua 
  > Pandira) was born and when he taught. Today the Christian Church 
  is, 
  > as far as I view it, still in darkness, and a number of those who 
  > call themselves filled with wisdom are also in darkness, because 
  they 
  > find the Bible to be infallible.
  > > 
  > > 
  > > M. Sufilight
  > > 
  > > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > > From: christinaleestemaker 
  > > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  > > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 6:29 PM
  > > Subject: Re: Theos-World 2012 ?
  > > 
  > > 
  > > So what after 33 years? If 1-33 is darkness, is not the whole 
  > > darkness?
  > > Christina
  > > 
  > > / 
  > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" 
  <global-
  > > theosophy@> wrote:
  > > >
  > > > Dear friends
  > > > 
  > > > My views are:
  > > > 
  > > > Blavatsky and Master said that Jesus was born in Lod (Lydda) 
  > year 
  > > 120 BC.
  > > > 
  > > > W. C. Leadbeater and Annie Besant said 105 BC. And Alice A. 
  > Bailey 
  > > wrote a book titled "From Bethlehem to Calvary" saying in this 
  > book, 
  > > that "the historical accuracy of His story remains as yet 
  > unsolved" 
  > > and "for when He was born at Bethlehem, it was not simply the 
  > birth 
  > > of another divine Teacher and Messenger" .
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > Now who is telling the truth?
  > > > 
  > > > - - -
  > > > 
  > > > H. P. Blavatsky on the New Testament and Jesus:
  > > > "This theory of the seven keys, the Church, according to the 
  > Abbé 
  > > Roca, has simplified "without disfiguring it," reducing the 
  keys 
  > to 
  > > three; while, on the contrary, it has fabricated three false 
  keys 
  > > which do not open anything. The legend of which I speak is 
  > founded, 
  > > as I have demonstrated over and over again in my writings and 
  my 
  > > notes, on the existence of a personage called Jehoshua (from 
  > which 
  > > Jesus has been made) born at Lüd or Lydda about 120 years 
  before 
  > the 
  > > modern era. And if this fact is denied-to which I can hardly 
  > object-
  > > one must resign oneself to regard the hero of the drama of 
  > Calvary as 
  > > a myth pure and simple. As a matter of fact, in spite of all 
  the 
  > > desperate research made during long centuries, if we set aside 
  > the 
  > > testimony of the "Evangelists," i.e., unknown men whose 
  identity 
  > has 
  > > never been established, and that of the Fathers of the Church, 
  > > interested fanatics, neither history, nor profane tradition, 
  > neither 
  > > official documents, nor the contemporaries of the soi-disant 
  > drama, 
  > > are able to provide one single serious proof of the historical 
  > and 
  > > real existence, not only of the Man-God but even of him called 
  > Jesus 
  > > of Nazareth, from the year 1 to the year 33. All is darkness 
  and 
  > > silence." 
  > > > (H. P. Blavatsly's Collected Writings, vol. 9, p. 225-6). 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > M. Sufilight
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > > > From: christinaleestemaker 
  > > > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:31 PM
  > > > Subject: Re: Theos-World 2012 ?
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > Right, no one can be sure, for we have not been in the time 
  > Jezus 
  > > was 
  > > > born.It was written that he was there long before the 
  counting 
  > > > started in the year 1 from our calender
  > > > 
  > > > Christina
  > > > 
  > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva <silva_cass@> 
  > wrote:
  > > > >
  > > > > Not sure what you are getting at Christina
  > > > > Cass
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > ________________________________
  > > > > From: christinaleestemaker <christinaleestemaker@>
  > > > > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
  > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 17 December, 2008 10:03:26 PM
  > > > > Subject: Theos-World 2012 ?
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > I read somewhere Leon wrote to Cass the change in 2012 but 
  we 
  > > must 
  > > > > not forget that our beginning of yearcounting happened 7 
  > years 
  > > > after 
  > > > > Jezus birthday.
  > > > > Christina
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter 
  > > > now http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/?
  > > p1=other&p2=au&p3=tagline
  > > > > 
  > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > > > >
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > 
  > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > > >
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > >
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]