Theos-Talk Archives (December 2008 Message tt00220)

What he said!

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Cass,
> 
> Yes, I think we've already broken through the last barrier toward  
> fulfilling HPB's prophesy in the very near future.  (Perhaps this 
is  
> the great new change that the Mayan calendar has been telling us 
is  
> coming around 2012... Not an end, but a beginning. ;-)
> 
> The final proof will come when the ABC model can be demonstrated 
as  
> fact beyond a shadow of a doubt.  Already research is being 
planned  
> that will demonstrate, so everyone can see and experience it, that  
> the universe is a hologram, and what we can know of it is already 
in  
> our higher mind...  Pretty much the way HPB described it (if you 
can  
> read the SD "in and around the words and between the lines" and 
cut  
> through all the "blinds").
> 
> As for the previous universe and pralaya...
> 
> All that it requires, is for the universe to continue to expand --  
> and lose entropy -- until everything in it dissolves back into the  
> aether or absolute space... With total metric space and its mass- 
> energy "particles" and their forms compacting into infinite zero- 
> (laya) points of spin momentum or "abstract motion" (while still  
> containing all the information as holographic wave interference  
> patterns)... While that aether, which in its overall nature is like 
a  
> "Bose Einstein Condensate" (see wikipedia.com) remains ONE 
thing...  
> "Whose center, when manifest, is everywhere and circumference 
nowhere".
> 
> That "total space" (as Einstein called it) is the cosmic  
> "singularity" that reflects itself in every potentially conscious  
> black hole at the center of every universal form -- whose still  
> center, at absolute zero, during pralaya, is pure (sleeping)  
> potential cosmic consciousness and potential matter... Ready to 
wake  
> up again and go through another cosmogenesis, until we all 
reappear  
> in the new cycle of life, to further evolve on a higher plane, and  
> take up where we left off in the previous manvantara ;-)  See:
> http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/evolution2.gif
> Note that the fractal involved field model of cosmogenesis  
> analogously applies to the physical universe as well as all the  
> galaxies and other forms of mass-energy, on down through our solar  
> system and planet, to the fundamental particles (spherical 
standing  
> waves) of light. See:
> (head on cross section of a single spherically polarized photon)
> http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/PhotonField.gif
> And compare to: (cosmogenesis at the third Logos)
> http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/Chakrafield-spherical-col_3.jpg
> 
> For an interesting take on this, see Feynman's talk about light:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjHJ7FmV0M4
> 
> All that -- putting together Einstein's general relativity, 
Feynman's  
> quantum electrodynamics, Bohm-Pribram's' holographic paradigm, 
Kaluza- 
> Klien-Greene-Witten-Kaku's string and membrane physics -- 
certainly  
> is "scientific"... And, all of it totally consistent with the ABC  
> model of cosmogenesis, based solely on the formulas in the Book of  
> Dzyan, as explained by HPB.
> 
> Then, when pralaya is over (as the modern scientific pundits  
> speculate from their mathematics) -- the infinite new universes  
> (galaxies, solar systems, planets, bacteria, plants, animals, 
humans,  
> etc,) spring up everywhere in their time and place, like spray in 
an  
> ocean of waves... "As above, so below' and."The  microcosm(s) (is/ 
> are) the mirror(s) of the macrocosm" (as the ancient philosopher/ 
> scientist pundits say;-).
> 
> So, the cosmos (like every universe) and every composite form, or  
> particle-wave in it, is a hologram -- within even larger holograms -
-  
> ad infinitum.  And, as the Buddhist and Vedic philosophers 
say. "All  
> is Maya" or illusion.  (But, this cannot be "scientific," even 
though  
> actual -- since conventional science can only deal with the 
physical/ 
> material or measurable universe).  So, what we need is a new  
> scientific paradigm -- which we might call "philosophical science" 
or  
> "scientific philosophy" or maybe just plain "theosophy". ;-)
> 
> Best wishes,
> Leon Maurer
> http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/23/13 (NEW)
> http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/
> 
> 
> On Dec 14, 2008, at 12/14/088:48 PM, Cass Silva wrote:
> 
> > Hi Leon
> >
> > Science has finally come around to what HPB said 100 years ago.   
> > Still the problem remains - from where the previous universe - I  
> > guess Pralaya wouldn't explain it as it is a non-scientific  
> > concept.  Did HPB mention anything about conditions during 
Pralaya?
> >
> > Cass
> >
> > ps  Just listened to a doco on Steven Hawking - he agrees with  
> > Greene's theory of multi-dimensional vibration strings (rather 
than  
> > particles) and says it explains why gravity is weaker in our 3  
> > dimensions because it has travelled through 8 others.  They are  
> > more or less stating that Quantum Mechanics explains gravity at 
the  
> > quantum level ( at the smallest) and marries it with Relativity 
(at  
> > the largest) and Hawkings Black Hole Theory
> >
> > If I understood it correctly they cannot explain what they call  
> > 'the singularity' other than to say the symmetry was broken and 
are  
> > now toying with the idea of universes not unlike particles, just  
> > popping in and out of existence!   And this from the greatest 
minds  
> > of modern science.
> >
> > Cass
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@...>
> > To: jcs-online Study forum <jcs-online@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, 14 December, 2008 6:09:51 PM
> > Subject: Theos-World Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
> >
> >
> > Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
> >
> > http://www.newscien tist.com/ article/mg200268 61.500-did- our-
cosmos-
> > exist-before- the-big-bang. html?DCMP= NLC-nletter&  
> > nsref=mg20026861 .500
> >
> > http://tinyurl. com/5tkvfb
> >
> > Very likely -- if the ABC fractal involved holographic field 
model of
> > periodic cosmogenesis is correct.
> >
> > Leon Maurer
> > http://canonizer. com/topic. asp/23/13
> > "Note: This canonizer topic ("HARD PROBLEM") enables us to 
directly
> > compare theories and models of consciousness and its 
interconnections
> > with mind, memory, brain, body, senses, etc.. If you agree with 
the
> > ABC theory of cosmogenesis -- postulating consciousness as an a
> > priori quality of ubiquitous absolute space (or any other 
reasonable
> > theory) please feel free to sign on to add your support or, if you
> > have anything to add or contribute to the topic, or wish to post 
your
> > own theory, open a new sub-camp or camp statement."
> > http://www.tellworl d.com/Astro. Biological. Coenergetics/
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>