Theos-Talk Archives (November 2008 Message tt00108)

Nobody is talking.

All this started with the ultra secret proposal by the Quartet to
disenfranchise all of us and also take control of the Presidency and make
the President a puppet. The proposal was also planned to get it done
speedily in the next meeting and surprise all of us. But for Internet, they
would have achieved their aim and we would have had a Christmas surprise.

I do not known how much credibility is left for the quartet. Until we hear
that the proposal has been withdrawn by the quartet, we have to assume they
are pushing it very hard. There is no other option.

Further more, all the silence from everyone makes me very suspicious and
hence we all should be vigilant and watchful. Here we are not talking about
the future of any individuals but the TS and the theosophy.

mkr


On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Anton Rozman <anton_rozman@yahoo.com> wrote:

>   It would be very instructive if our reliable sources will be more
> talkative also about the situation at the Headquarters in Adyar; I am
> sure they can provide accurate information.
>
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>, "Anand"
> <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "Konstantin Zaitzev"
> > <kay_ziatz@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "Anton Rozman" <anton_rozman@>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > There seems clear that proposed Amendments to the TS Rules and
> > > > Regulations will not be on official agenda of the GC meeting and
> > > > will be discussed only informally.
> > >
> > > And as far I understood, John Algeo does no way insist on the
> > > proposal; the aim of the proposal was rather to raise the
> discussion,
> > > and the alternative proposals from around the world are already
> being
> > > received.
> > >
> >
> > As our reliable sources told us in this group, the request was made
> by
> > the quartet to pass the proposal and not just to discuss it. Members
> > should remain vigilant, and should show their strong opposition to
> > disenfranchisement.
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]