theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Algeo's motives Re: TS - Disenfranchisement - Comments of a GC Member

Nov 06, 2008 09:57 AM
by Anand


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Konstantin Zaitzev"
<kay_ziatz@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Anand,
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@> wrote:
> 
> > The system of election of the international President, which John
> > Algeo camp is suggesting, will make TS much more vulnerable to
> 
> I'm also for the direct elections, though in sake of justice I have to
> note that John Algeo is sincere in his statement where he writes that
> he is happy that he wasn't elected. He wrote me the same thing in a
> private letter just after the elections took place, long before the
> proposals about rule 10 were made. So it's not his selfish interest
> but just his point of view on the welfare of the Society, with which
> we may not agree.
> Of course, I couldn't mention it earlier, before I've seen the same
> things in an open statement.

I had not campaigned for Radha or John during the election. It is only
when disastrous proposal was brought by the "quartet" that I had to
write many things about constitution and show how proposal was not
good for the TS and it's members. Whether John Algeo was sincere or
not is different issue. My purpose of writing is to make constitution
better, so that TS and Theosophy will progress.
I find it very strange when John sends his statements to individuals,
instead of sending them on forums himself, or publishing on his web
site where authenticity can be established. He must be able to stand
for his statements and opinions.
Best
Anand Gholap






[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application