Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00854)

Dear Anand

My views are:

Sometimes I would have the hope, that various Seekers would avoid confusing "followers of Blavatsky" with followers of the true theosophical CAUSE - the wisdom teachings of all ages.

To disagree with other fellow Seekers is to a theosophical initiate often done with compassion in the spiritual heart. Assuming that there is no spiritual Heart of compassion present, when there actually is ONE there, will not make it go away.

The science of compassionately disagreeing is an important part of the theosophical teachings.

These are my views. The readers might of course disagree or even agree.


M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anand 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 11:58 AM
  Subject: Re: Theos-World Fanaticism among the students of Blavatsky admitted by her devotee



  > Just now I read message on one yahoo group completely dedicated to
  > Blavatsky. It is written by Carl Millar from ULT. Here is what he says. 
  > "many years ago, I visited the ULT in Los Angeles several times, and I
  > felt very very uncomfortable, because there was such divisiveness 
  > and animosity in the group. I really never understood the conflict,
  > because I just stopped attending, but there was such acrimony. During
  > the study, people would make absolutely vicious remarks without even
  > looking at the person they were directed toward." 
  > 

  It is very strange because the first object of the TS was to create
  nucleus of Universal Brotherhood. Fact is there is no brotherhood even
  among the followers of Blavatsky. There is universal enmity as can be
  seen from Carl's message and that of many other students of Theosophy. 



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]