Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00430)

Anand,

You write:

--------------------------------------------------------
Blavatsky herself has written that letters are not verbatim, they are
not written by Master's hand. So, what I have written is, I think,
proven by Blavatsky's own writing.
There are my own other reasons to arrive at conclusions, but as my
statements can be proved by well documented facts, I am not writing
those other reasons.
-------------------------------------------------------

I would love to see these "well documented facts" and I'm sure others 
would like to see them too!!

And you should give your "other reasons" too since that might throw 
light on this subject.

You say that:

---------------------------------------------------------
what I have written is, I think, proven by Blavatsky's own writing.
---------------------------------------------------------

But let us look at just one quote by Blavatsky.

She writes:

-------------------------------------------------------
...it is hardly one out of a hundred "occult" letters that is ever
written by the [physical] hand of the Master, in whose name and on
whose behalf they are sent, as the Masters have neither need nor
leisure to write them; and that when a Master says, "I wrote that
letter," it means only that every word in it was dictated by him and
impressed under his direct supervision.
-------------------------------------------------------

Please notice what Blavatsky wrote in the latter part of this above 
quote.

Anand, is this what you have been saying in your previous postings????

Daniel
http://hpb.cc